Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,723 of 130,039    |
|    knuttle to Ruth Wilson    |
|    Re: Percy Ellwood    |
|    01 Sep 18 12:45:14    |
      XPost: alt.genealogy, england.genealogy.misc, free.uk.genealogy       From: keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net              On 9/1/2018 11:44 AM, Ruth Wilson wrote:       > On 31/08/2018 14:49, Jenny M Benson wrote:       >> On 31-Aug-18 12:09 PM, knuttle wrote:       >>> Unfortunately this error still appears in some online trees, and       >>> their owner seem un interested in correcting their mistake.       >>       >> I often wonder why so many people publish their trees but seem totally       >> uninterested in accuracy or in making contact with possible relatives.       >>       >> I often contact people along the lines of "I see you have Joe Bloggs       >> on your tree, who is my nth cousin n x removed. Can you tell me what       >> your Source is for ... as the information I have found suggests ... I       >> am happy to share with you", but only very rarely do I get any response.       >>       > I once contacted someone who had linked to my line through one of my       > gt-grandmother's brothers as an emigrant to America. As I don't know       > what happened to him in later life, it could well be him, although he       > then appeared with a middle name (which he could have adopted in       > adulthood for any number of reasons).       > When I asked the contributor how she "knew" this was the right John       > Palmer, she replied that John Palmer was the son of John and Isabella       > born in Cumberland ... basically repeating the information in the tree.       > No mention of any sources - family bible, marriage certificate,       > immigration documentation, etc. Grrrr!       > I didn't continue the conversation!       > Ruth       Don't be so quick to give up on this information.              In a side family I found a person of the right age with his parents. And       then found a person with a different name in the same area, of same age,       and a couple of years later married to the my person. I found this       couple in later documentation and the spouses age was as the person       living with his parents.              I found that there was an online tree with both my person and a person       with first and middle names that I thought was two people. ie John and       George vs John George.              When I asked the owner he said the only documentation was the fact that       he knew that in the family the person had been referred to by both       names. I don't know how you documented this type of situation.              After a frustrating series of emails I gave up, and continued working on       my family. A day or two later I was working on the family I grew up in,       and realized I had a similar situation. All my life, I had heard my       uncle referred to by both his first or middle names depending on the       situation.              After much searching I found a family bible that listed the birth       information of the siblings in that family. In that bible his birth       records listed both names. I copies the bible pages for my records and       sort of forgave the tree owner that caused me the frustration.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca