Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,861 of 130,039    |
|    Tony Proctor to All    |
|    Re: Google Groups    |
|    07 Jan 19 18:15:26    |
      From: tony@proctor_NoMore_SPAM.net              On 03/01/2019 11:27, MB wrote:       > On 03/01/2019 10:40, Graeme Wall wrote:       >> On 03/01/2019 10:05, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:       >>> On 2019-01-03 01:28:36 +0000, Steve Hayes said:       >>>       >>>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 10:08:30 +0000, nemo@erewhon.invalid (John Hill)       >>>> wrote:       >>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> [ … ]       >>>       >>>>>       >>>> I doubt that there can be a "Group Owner" sinbce no one "owns" usenet       >>>> newsgroups. Google decided, on their own initiativew to gate usenet       >>>> groups to their GoogleGroups system.       >>>>       >>>>> Mind you, Google Groups is not Usenet, much as it would like people to       >>>>> think it is, and it seem to me that soc.genealogy.britain is working       >>>>> very nicely for people who have proper usenet readers.       >>>>       >>>> Indeed.       >>>>       >>>> The advantage of having newsgroups gated there is that they can be       >>>> discovered by people who are interested in genealogy. The       >>>> disadvantage, of course, is that they can also be discovered by       >>>> spammers.       >>>       >>> You don't need Google Groups for that. Anyone who knows about Usenet can       find this group by searching through the complete list of groups. That's       >>> how I found it.       >>>       >>>       >>       >> A lot of people don't realise that.       >>       >       >       > It is rather like the "old days" when USENET was dominated by academic users       who always seemed to resent anyone else using it even though they were       > getting access free at their work when others were probably paying in some       way. It was full of petty arguments about things like top and bottom posting.       >       > Shouldn't we be trying to attract new users to ensure its survival, so       everything does not disappear onto Farcebook?       >       >       >              It's true that s.g.britain has waned since its heyday, but have a look at       s.g.computing -- it's virtually dead. Is that a reflection on the likes of       Google Groups and specialist forums being more convenient to the subject than       USENET?              Tony              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca