From: G6JPG-255@255soft.uk   
      
   In message , Tickettyboo   
    writes:   
   >On 2019-01-27 18:38:57 +0000, John Hill said:   
   >   
   >> J. P. Gilliver (John)  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> How about a three-way referendum, allowing second choices?   
   >>  I rather like this idea - No deal exit/Deal/No exit - mark 1,2,3 to   
   >>show   
   >> preference.   
   >>  Though just how you would weight the scores is a bit of a problem   
   >>:-(   
   >>  And there would probably be a lot of spoilt papers.   
   >>  J.   
   >   
   >In what way is this relevant to genealogy?   
   >Usenet has lots of groups more appropriate for your discussion   
      
   To be fair, John Hall did add [OT] to the subject line (and changed it),   
   before picking up on a line in my signature. But I do apologise.   
      
   [I was trying to help MB find out something about his aunt, mentioned in   
   the 1939 register.]   
      
   JPG   
   ===   
      
      
   How about a three-way referendum, allowing second choices?   
   --   
   Ever been frustrated that you can't disagree with a petition? See 255soft.uk   
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   All I ask is to _prove_ that money can't make me happy.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)