From: G6JPG-255@255soft.uk   
      
   In message , Graeme Wall   
    writes:   
   >On 23/03/2019 09:48, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:   
   []   
   >>  This particular petition, like all petitions, is lessened in impact   
   >>by  the fact that it only collects signatures on one side; I've been   
   >>waiting  for someone to start a counter-petition, and been surprised   
   >>they  haven't. Part of the reason _may_ be that the petitions   
   >>committee are  blocking any such attempt, on the (spurious IMO)   
   >>grounds that "it is not  clear what result you wish this petition to   
   achieve".   
   >>   
   >   
   >As I said there already is one.   
   >   
   As _I_ said, (a) it's more specific [it asks for a no-deal exit, and   
   without delay], and (b) I couldn't find it anyway.   
      
   JPG   
   ---   
      
      
   LET'S HAVE THOSE "INDICATIVE" VOTES!!! I think they're the only way we can   
   even _draft_ any "new deal" (assuming MV3 fails as expected).   
   --   
   Those who _don't_ favour the "revoke" petition have nowhere to express that.   
   https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232770 255soft.uk #fairpetitions   
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   ... some language may be offensive to younger viewers. Like "please" and   
   "thank you". (Intro to /Off Their Rockers/, quoted in RT 25-31 May 2013 by   
   Sarah Millican.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)