Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,011 of 130,039    |
|    Tim Powys-Lybbe to Ruth Wilson    |
|    Re: Ancestry - combining trees    |
|    18 Apr 19 01:01:23    |
      From: tim@powys.org              On 12/04/2019 10:29 am, Ruth Wilson wrote:              > Thanks for the replies. I think it is probably best to just import a new       > 'whole' tree from Brother's Keeper, which is my main database. That's       > the one I update religiously with new information, whereas Ancestry I       > keep for the hints which contain the odd gem or two!       >       > Fingers crossed I get some proof of the Scottish line ...       >       > Ruth              A core problem is that Gedcom is NOT a standard. There is no set of       rules that all providers of tree programs agree on nor are there any       tests to show that they have conformed to whatever might have been       agreed. So whatever comes out of one GEDCOM might not all go in to the       receiving one. You have to do your own tests and do extensive checks       that all bits of data have survived the migration.              Further there is no guarantee that the likes of Ancestry will not       eventually die or get bored and then cheerfully discard your valuable       data. So you would be better advised to keep your master data elsewhere.              But your data must still be backed up somewhere to treasure it. My best       advice is to place it somewhere with internet access and encourage       everyone to copy it.              I would not advise keeping your data on multiple databases for different       trees. You will eventually, as you have found, want to combine them.       And that is murder having to go through everybody to ensure they have       merged well and that there are no duplicates.              It is perfectly possible to have all your family trees on the one       database system. But you must choose a system that allows you to       identify each tree (selections queries, flags, etc). Then you must get       the hang of creating reports for selections from you sole main database.        And you probably also need a flag to show those with good data and       those with speculative guesses: a score out of 5 would do and you should       include the score needed for inclusion in each report you are going to       make and send to others.              I suppose I could go on for a long while on this but I have been using       one program now for over twenty years. It started as Reunion on a PC       then became Generations on a PC then the owners abandoned it but I could       still migrate the files to Reunion on a Mac and, with continual support       and development, the program does virtually all that I need and a bit       more besides. I've tried other programs but have never concluded that I       ought to migrate.              --       Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@powys.org        for a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca