Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,031 of 130,039    |
|    Keith Nuttle to Doug Laidlaw    |
|    Re: Why I am not interested in DNA    |
|    19 Apr 19 14:08:20    |
      From: Keith_Nuttle@sbcglobal.net              On 4/19/2019 12:59 PM, Doug Laidlaw wrote:       > Firstly, I am a number-cruncher only when I am bored and have nothing       > better to do. I always think of the man who discovered he was related       > to Carthaginian sailors and was _so_ pleased. [The Carthaginians were       > good as sailors, but for their army, they engaged mercenaries.]       >       > Secondly, DNA testing has often done more harm than good. In one case,       > the applicant discovered she had none of her father's DNA. In a case I       > have just been reading, a couple decided to take a DNA test. It showed       > that the male partner was related to a serial killer. His g-f couldn't       > handle this, and left him. Maybe she was looking for a way to split,       > and this was her excuse, as the comforters on social media suggested.       > But in both cases, there were facts that it was better not to know. I       > have enough inherited illnesses; I don't need to know about any others.DNA       is a tool, and should be thought of a a tool and not as a       replacement for other sources used for research.              It can some times find things about your ancestors that you could find       in no other way. I have worked on my families for nearly 20 years. I       had two family connections in my 3rd great grandparents generation that       I had collected a lot of circumstantial evidence for the connection but       in all of that time I was still not sure I the connection was valid.       Some of the first DNA matches I found were to those great grandparent       which supported the circumstantial connection. I now have DNA matches       to all of my previously found documented ancestors and DNA help me add a       couple of generation to some of my families.              My wife learned of a half brother. We knew of the baby, but had no idea       who he was. DNA plus some documentation proved the connection. I have       also worked with other researcher who are trying to find their natural       family using the DNA matches.              I too find it distressing that name collectors use DNA like all of the       other sources available and add people to their trees that are not in       their families.              I find it equally frustrating to find a DNA match and find the owner has       has a couple of entries in this tree, or the tree marked private, either       way the tree is useless for some one researching their families.                     --       2018: The year we learn to play the great game of Euchre              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca