home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.genealogy.britain      Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan      130,039 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 129,199 of 130,039   
   john to Richard Smith   
   Re: Florence Fernyhough born 190x - fath   
   16 Nov 19 12:25:20   
   
   From: john1@s145802280.onlinehome.fr   
      
   On 16/11/2019 11:36, Richard Smith wrote:   
   > On 15/11/2019 17:58, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:   
   >    
   >> Emma Foxley and William Fernyhough married in 1884.  Emma has   
   >> children, all with surname Fernyhough, [...] and finally Florence in   
   >> 1901.   
   > Okay.  So this Florence is the daughter of Emma.   
   >    
   >> The 1911 census shows Florence Fernyhough, Head, 55, Widow, with (a    
   >> son aged 26 and) Florence Fernyhough, Daughter, 9 (so born 1902 or '1).   
   >    
   > And this Florence is the daughter of Florence.  Are you sure they're the    
   > same person?   
   >    
   >> FreeBMD and GRO show a Florence Fernyhough birth registered in   
   >> Wolstanton in 1901Q3 - with mother's maiden name Mellor.    
   >    
   > Neither the GRO index nor FreeBMD show the mother's maiden name prior to    
   > about 1911, and I've just looked up this birth, and there is definitely    
   > no mother's maiden name shown in either place.  Presumably that means    
   > you have the birth certificate.  If so, what does it say is the mother's    
   > name?  Emma or Florence?  I assume the father is not given.   
   >    
   >> No other Florence Fernyhough birth registration is shown in 1902 ±2.   
   > Indeed not.  However the GRO index lists a Florence Ferneyhough born in    
   > Q3 1901 in the Stone district of Staffs.  The difference between    
   > Ferneyhough and Fernyhough is small enough that it could simply be an    
   > error by the clerk who compiled the index from the handwritten registers.   
   >    
   > The most obvious explanation to me is that you have two Florences: one   
   > the daughter of Florence, the other the daughter of Emma.   
   >    
   > Richard   
      
     The 1911 census shows Florence Fernyhough, Head, 55, Widow, with (a   
    >> son aged 26 and) Florence Fernyhough, Daughter, 9 (so born 1902 or '1).   
   That is an error and should be Emma Fernyhough, Head 55......   
      
    From the GRO, Florence Ferneyhough  is the daughter of Emma   
   FERNEYHOUGH, FLORENCE    	FOXLEY   
   GRO Reference: 1901  S Quarter in STONE  Volume 06B  Page 31   
      
   in 1901 census Emma was a grocer shopkeeper, so plenty of friendly    
   customers?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca