Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,199 of 130,039    |
|    john to Richard Smith    |
|    Re: Florence Fernyhough born 190x - fath    |
|    16 Nov 19 12:25:20    |
      From: john1@s145802280.onlinehome.fr              On 16/11/2019 11:36, Richard Smith wrote:       > On 15/11/2019 17:58, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:       >        >> Emma Foxley and William Fernyhough married in 1884. Emma has       >> children, all with surname Fernyhough, [...] and finally Florence in       >> 1901.       > Okay. So this Florence is the daughter of Emma.       >        >> The 1911 census shows Florence Fernyhough, Head, 55, Widow, with (a        >> son aged 26 and) Florence Fernyhough, Daughter, 9 (so born 1902 or '1).       >        > And this Florence is the daughter of Florence. Are you sure they're the        > same person?       >        >> FreeBMD and GRO show a Florence Fernyhough birth registered in       >> Wolstanton in 1901Q3 - with mother's maiden name Mellor.        >        > Neither the GRO index nor FreeBMD show the mother's maiden name prior to        > about 1911, and I've just looked up this birth, and there is definitely        > no mother's maiden name shown in either place. Presumably that means        > you have the birth certificate. If so, what does it say is the mother's        > name? Emma or Florence? I assume the father is not given.       >        >> No other Florence Fernyhough birth registration is shown in 1902 ±2.       > Indeed not. However the GRO index lists a Florence Ferneyhough born in        > Q3 1901 in the Stone district of Staffs. The difference between        > Ferneyhough and Fernyhough is small enough that it could simply be an        > error by the clerk who compiled the index from the handwritten registers.       >        > The most obvious explanation to me is that you have two Florences: one       > the daughter of Florence, the other the daughter of Emma.       >        > Richard               The 1911 census shows Florence Fernyhough, Head, 55, Widow, with (a        >> son aged 26 and) Florence Fernyhough, Daughter, 9 (so born 1902 or '1).       That is an error and should be Emma Fernyhough, Head 55......               From the GRO, Florence Ferneyhough is the daughter of Emma       FERNEYHOUGH, FLORENCE FOXLEY       GRO Reference: 1901 S Quarter in STONE Volume 06B Page 31              in 1901 census Emma was a grocer shopkeeper, so plenty of friendly        customers?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca