Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,207 of 130,039    |
|    MB to knuttle    |
|    Re: Children born out of wedlock    |
|    17 Nov 19 13:34:19    |
      From: MB@nospam.net              On 17/11/2019 12:55, knuttle wrote:       > This thread has talked a lot about DNA and the fact that the test method       > is new. Blood type has been mentioned and everyone seems to think of it       > as an old technique. The typing of blood was only discovered a little       > more than 100 hears ago. So if you have developed family tree of any       > size, none knew their blood type let alone had the concept of blood type.       >                     DNA within a family is difficult.              Don't forget that a married couple in the UK nearly spent a long time in       prison because the body of a baby found at their house matched the       wife's DNA so they were obviously guilty of killing it.              They were very lucky being able to prove that they were out of the       country when it had been born and killed / died. Further investigation       suggested it highly likely that the wife's mother was guilty even though       she had died by then.              There was no doubt that they would have been convicted because DNA       cannot be wrong - statistics like one in x billion chance impress juries.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca