From: G6JPG@255soft.uk   
      
   In message , Jenny M Benson   
    writes:   
   >On 17/11/2019 13:19, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:   
   >> though I'd have _normally_ expected such a child to live with her mother.   
   >   
   >I am frequently shouting at the tv during WDYTYA because an assumption   
   >is made that someone appearing on a census in a certain place is living   
   >there.  Just because a child is enumerated with - for example - a   
   >grandparent on Census night, it doesn't necessariy mean it was not to   
   >be found with its parent(s) for the other 364 nights of the year.   
   >   
   Indeed; they could just be visiting their grandparents (or whatever) on   
   census night.   
      
   Also, I have two cases in my tree of someone who's in two places at   
   once; I think one's their normal abode and someone just forgot they were   
   away that night, and the other's where they were starting work at the   
   remote address but (someone) assumed it wasn't their permanent address.   
   I've also encountered (in the case of an inn) "refused to give name".   
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   Can a blue man sing the whites?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)