home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.genealogy.britain      Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan      130,039 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 129,308 of 130,039   
   john to Jenny M Benson   
   Re: Name anomaly   
   17 Apr 20 19:57:12   
   
   From: john1@s145802280.onlinehome.fr   
      
   On 17/04/2020 17:12, Jenny M Benson wrote:   
   > Can anyone suggest what is going on in this scenario.   
   >    
   > In the 1881 Census (RG11-3529-94-38) John Weedall, who married an    
   > Elizabeth Fletcher in 1876, and his wife Elizabeth are shown with a    
   > daughter, Lily, aged 1 year and an unspecified child of unknown name    
   > with the age of 8 days in the "Female" column.   
   >    
   > In the 1891 Census (RG12-2841-111-32) the John is absent and Ann's name    
   > is partly obscured, but is readable as Annie.  Her children are shown as    
   > Florence, Lilly, Ruth, John H, Mary Jane and Sarah Annie.  As Ruth is 10    
   > years old, she will be the unnamed child in 1881.   
   >    
   > Before finding the Census entries, I had located the birth registrations    
   > of Florence, Mary Jane, Ruth and Sarah Annie in the GRO index, all with    
   > the maiden name Fletcher.  (Plus 2 boys who do not appear on the    
   > Censuses so probably died.)  After seeing the 1881 Census, I searched    
   > for, but could not find, an entry for Lilly or Lily Weedall with MMN of    
   > Fletcher.  After viewing the 1891 Census, I did a less specific search    
   > and found John Holford Weedale with mother's maiden name Holford.  I    
   > then searched for other Weedalls with MMN Holford and found Leonora in   
   > June Q 1880, the right age to be Lil(l)y.   
   >    
   > I wondered if Ann(ie) had been previously married and had confused her   
   > former married name with her maiden name, but can't find any    
   > Holford/Fletcher marriage.  The Holford children cannot be the product    
   > of either parent from an earlier relationship because they are both    
   > between other children of the marriage.  They could be the product of    
   > one of John's relations and adopted by John & Ann, but it's unlikely as    
   > that would mean 2 convenient gaps in the sequence of their birth children.   
   >    
   > I am at a loss to explain it myself.   
      
   Do these help?   
      
   WEEDOW, LILY    	FLETCHER   
   GRO Reference: 1879  S Quarter in NORTHWICH  Volume 08A  Page 288   
      
   WEADOW, JOHN  HENRY  	FLETCHER   
   GRO Reference: 1883  J Quarter in NORTHWICH  Volume 08A  Page 292   
      
   -------------   
      
   WEEDALL, FLORENCE    	FLETCHER   
   GRO Reference: 1877  S Quarter in NORTHWICH  Volume 08A  Page 269   
   It looks as though Florence (niece) was with William and Elizabeth Mills   
   RG11; P 3647; F 160; P 62 I've not checked further on that relationship.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca