Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,308 of 130,039    |
|    john to Jenny M Benson    |
|    Re: Name anomaly    |
|    17 Apr 20 19:57:12    |
      From: john1@s145802280.onlinehome.fr              On 17/04/2020 17:12, Jenny M Benson wrote:       > Can anyone suggest what is going on in this scenario.       >        > In the 1881 Census (RG11-3529-94-38) John Weedall, who married an        > Elizabeth Fletcher in 1876, and his wife Elizabeth are shown with a        > daughter, Lily, aged 1 year and an unspecified child of unknown name        > with the age of 8 days in the "Female" column.       >        > In the 1891 Census (RG12-2841-111-32) the John is absent and Ann's name        > is partly obscured, but is readable as Annie. Her children are shown as        > Florence, Lilly, Ruth, John H, Mary Jane and Sarah Annie. As Ruth is 10        > years old, she will be the unnamed child in 1881.       >        > Before finding the Census entries, I had located the birth registrations        > of Florence, Mary Jane, Ruth and Sarah Annie in the GRO index, all with        > the maiden name Fletcher. (Plus 2 boys who do not appear on the        > Censuses so probably died.) After seeing the 1881 Census, I searched        > for, but could not find, an entry for Lilly or Lily Weedall with MMN of        > Fletcher. After viewing the 1891 Census, I did a less specific search        > and found John Holford Weedale with mother's maiden name Holford. I        > then searched for other Weedalls with MMN Holford and found Leonora in       > June Q 1880, the right age to be Lil(l)y.       >        > I wondered if Ann(ie) had been previously married and had confused her       > former married name with her maiden name, but can't find any        > Holford/Fletcher marriage. The Holford children cannot be the product        > of either parent from an earlier relationship because they are both        > between other children of the marriage. They could be the product of        > one of John's relations and adopted by John & Ann, but it's unlikely as        > that would mean 2 convenient gaps in the sequence of their birth children.       >        > I am at a loss to explain it myself.              Do these help?              WEEDOW, LILY FLETCHER       GRO Reference: 1879 S Quarter in NORTHWICH Volume 08A Page 288              WEADOW, JOHN HENRY FLETCHER       GRO Reference: 1883 J Quarter in NORTHWICH Volume 08A Page 292              -------------              WEEDALL, FLORENCE FLETCHER       GRO Reference: 1877 S Quarter in NORTHWICH Volume 08A Page 269       It looks as though Florence (niece) was with William and Elizabeth Mills       RG11; P 3647; F 160; P 62 I've not checked further on that relationship.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca