Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,404 of 130,039    |
|    Athel Cornish-Bowden to All    |
|    [OT] Sr., Jr., III, IV ...    |
|    15 Aug 20 12:15:06    |
      From: acornish@imm.cnrs.fr              This is not really a question about British genealogy, as in Britain       suffixes like Jr. are far less common than in the USA. However, someone       here may know. There was a discussion recently in another group       (alt.usage.english) about how far the III, IV ... can go in practice. I       read somewhere that there was someone in an Austrian or German       aristocratic family whose suffix was XV. Any pointers to who that is?       I'm not thinking of Kings, Popes etc., for whom they can go as high as       XXIII, but of families in which the suffixes are actually treated as       part of the full name.              Actually it would quite convenient if they _were_ used more in British       families. My paternal great-great-greatgrandfather was Ambrose Bowden;       his father was Ambrose Bowden, whose father was Ambrose Bowden, whose       father was Ambrose Bowden. One can of course add one's own suffixes       when compiling family records, but I'm thinking of cases where the       people concerned use(d) them as part of their names.                     --       athel              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca