From: G6JPG@255soft.uk   
      
   Wymondham, Norfolk, England (both documents):   
      
   "Banns of Marriage between Abraham Turrell Bachelor and Elizabeth   
                              Austin Spinster, both of this Parish   
   ... 13th day of July 1788 ... 20th ... 27th day of July 1788."   
      
   Writing is clear; previous entry had third bann same day as first one   
   above.   
      
   "Abraham Turrell of the parish of Mulbarton   
    Bachelor, and Elizabeth Austin of this Parish Spinster were   
   Married in this Church by Banns   
   this Twenty Sixth Day of April in the Year One Thousand Seven Hundred   
   and Eighty Nine"   
      
   Same clear writing; previous entry 1789-2-12.   
      
   (Mulbarton is ~5.9 miles E of Wymondham.)   
      
   So: third bann 1788-7-27; marriage 1789-4-26.   
      
   Further information:   
      
   "Elizabeth Daur. of Abraham and Eliz.th Turrell (late Austin Spinster)   
   Was Priv: Bap.zd Nov: 27th [1788]". No "illegitimate" or anything. [I'm   
   guessing "Priv:" means "privately".]   
      
   Thoughts?   
   --   
   J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf   
      
   It's quickly getting to a place where privacy will be cause for suspicion.   
   - Mayayana in alt.windows7.general, 2018-11-6.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)