Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,766 of 130,039    |
|    Jenny M Benson to All    |
|    Ancestry    |
|    06 Feb 23 11:19:20    |
      From: NemoNews@hotmail.co.uk              There are 2 ways for a company to handle complaints: one is to ask their       customers if they have any and then take appropriate action. The other,       which is the one adopted by Ancestry, is to cause loads of them but then       make it almost impossible to receive any of them.              For some time now several things about the Ancestry website have       seriously niggled me (1) and when they invited me to take a survey I       thought it would be a good chance to air my thoughts. Question: "Would       I recommend Ancestry?" End of survey!              Then just recently I found that a page was missing from the 1861 Census       and I wanted to inform them of this. Was their a quick and easy way of       reporting this (as there is on FMP)? of course not! After trawling the       site in vain I resorted to making my complaint to a robot. The robot       answered a question I hadn't asked. I was then told I could "chat" to a       real person ... but I was told I was 8th in a queue and I was past       caring so I abandoned.              Why can't I quickly and easily send an e-mail which someone with some       authority can read and act upon? - even if the only action is to say       "we're not going to change that."              (1) My most pressing complaints:              (a) The impossibility of e-mailing them.       (b) The difficulty in informing them of missing items.       (c) I can't search the 1861 Census by reference (piece, folio, page.)       d) I can't search the 1891 Census by reference to a specific page.       (e) The Quick Links feature is really useful and I've used it a lot, but       now they are going to remove it.       (f) When I enter someone's name in a Search I do not want ALL their       details, including the names of their wife and 12 children automatically       populating the entire page. No one in their right mind would ever want       to search like that.       (g) I am subscribed to Ancestry.co.uk. Why do they keep sending me       links to Ancestry.com?              --       Jenny M Benson       Wrexham, UK              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca