Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130,033 of 130,039    |
|    J. P. Gilliver to john    |
|    Re: year quarters    |
|    08 Feb 26 14:17:43    |
      XPost: alt.genealogy       From: G6JPG@255soft.uk              On 2026/2/8 9:19:17, john wrote:       > On 06/02/2026 22:59, J. P. Gilliver wrote:              []              >> FWIW I record such events, if in plain text, as e. g. 1960Q2; in the       >> software I use (Brother's Keeper), which doesn't "know about" quarters,       >> I enter just the year, with Q2 in the comment field for that event.       >       > From an AI query for: "how should BMD dates, where the only reference       > is the entry occurring in a year quarter, be entered"       >       > For civil registration BMD events where you only know the registration       > quarter (e.g. UK GRO index entries), treat the “date” as an imprecise       > range, not a specific day.              Definitely. (Yes, I have seen people use the first - or last - day of       the quarter. IMO that's a Bad Idea, as it can be later taken to indicate       that the date is known precisely.)       >       > How to record the date       > Common, standards‑compatible options are:       >       > Use a quarter code as a date phrase, e.g. Q1 1883, Q2 1901, etc.; many              I'd probably seen that somewhere.              > genealogy programs and GEDCOM readers accept this and internally treat       > it as a range for Jan–Mar, Apr–Jun, Jul–Sep, or Oct–Dec respectively.              (Unfortunately, AFAIK at least, Brother's Keeper isn't one of them.)              >       > Use an explicit “between … and …” range, e.g. BET JAN 1883 AND MAR       1883       > for a Q1 registration; this is the official GEDCOM style and is widely       > understood by software and websites.              Indeed; it's just tedious! (Same applies to other such ranges; if       someone is recorded as age X in a census, then we know they were born       BET the date X+1 years less a day before census date and X years before       it, but it's a faff!)              >       > In all cases, remember the quarter refers to the registration date       > range, not necessarily the actual date of birth, marriage, or death, so       > do not invent a specific day or even a specific month unless you have       > further evidence.              Indeed. So events recorded in Q1 may well have happened in the previous       year (especially given any Christmas/New Year closedown). and - although       penalties for late registration were eventually introduced in some       circumstances - there's little checking that this didn't happen, in fact       may even encouraged incorrect registration.              >       > -------------       >       > It all depends on the program you use.       >       > I still use TMG (and see no reason to move to another program) which              I use Brother's Keeper (and the thought of changing gives me ...) ...              > does a lot to ensure correct dates and sorting and GEDCOM exports              ... which does some checking - both of format at time of entry, and (if       triggered) for illogical dates (e. g. birth/baptism/death/burial being       in the wrong order, or too old/young motherhood, or excessive age). I       presume any genealogy software worth its salt has some checking, both of       format and logic.              []              > Date within 20 years plus or minus:       > circa date       > cir date       > c date       > about date       > abt date              BK accepts CIR and ABT, though I don't think a figure of 20 is involved       anywhere. It also accepts unknown digits - for example, I use ddmmyyyy       (for entry - it displays them as d Mmm yyyy; it can use about ten       formats of entry/display to suit preferences, including the US variant),       and for example I can enter 2_041960 if I only know it was the       twenty-somethingth, or even _3041960 if only the second digit can be       made out in the source document. (For cases where there is a -1/+0       uncertainty in the year [such as birth year from age on census or at       marriage], I could enter e. g. 196_, though I tend to say CIR 1961 in       those cases, as I then know it means either the given year or th one       before.)       []              > One date or another date:       > date|date       > date or date              That one would be useful.       >       > From one date to another date:       > from date to date       > date to date              BK has something similar - it can take two dates, but can record whether       it's "starting date and ending date" (e. g. occupation, resided) or       "event happened somewhere between dates" (e. g. birth, qualification).       >       > I enter quarter dates as e.g. Jan-Mar 1899 and my TMG preferences       > changes them to Jan 1899 - Mar 1899 and uses that for the sort field              Sounds good.       >       > --------------------       >       > I started using Brother's Keeper in 1990 (or possibly earlier).       > Unfortunately I think that original DOS BK must have lacked any proper       > reference fields and all the source etc. information ended up in the       > comments field. So when I converted the 2000+ records I then had in BK              The current (v7) has reasonable source, comment, and witness fields per       event.              > when I switched to TMG in 2004 I ended up with source reference and       > related data in the TMG memo field. I've never sorted them out. I'm       > beginning to wonder whether ChatGPT AI could create a PYTHON program to       > tackle a GEDCOM export from my TMG and at least extract some source data       > and duplicate it in the correct reference fields?       >       Interesting thought! Do tell here if you try anything, and how well it       worked (I'd be particularly interested in if it did anything _wrong_ or       _lost_ anything).              >       >       >              --       J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf              ... the pleasure of the mind is an amazing thing. My life has been       driven by the satisfaction of curiosity. - Jeremy Paxman (being       interviewed by Anne Widdecombe), Radio Times, 2-8 July 2011.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca