Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.retirement    |    For seniors: retirement, aging, geronto    |    157,025 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 155,380 of 157,025    |
|    soup to All    |
|    How Come The Swiss Have Liberal Gun Laws    |
|    11 Apr 22 23:30:29    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics, aus.politics       XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.misc       XPost: uk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.atheism       XPost: or.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sac.politics       XPost: alt.politics, uk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns       XPost: alt.politics.trump       From: fafduser01@hotmail.com              >       >       >The Swiss Have Liberal Gun Laws, Too But they also have       >fewer gun-related deaths than the U.S.       >       >[Maybe it's because the Swiss have so few gun hugging       >American gunloons there]       >       >In February 2011, Swiss citizens voted in a referendum that       >called for a national gun registry and for firearms owned by       >members of the military to be stored in public arsenals.       >       >“It is a question of trust between the state and the       >citizen. The citizen is not just a citizen, he is also a       >soldier,” Hermann Suter, who at the time was vice president       >of the Swiss gun-rights group Pro Tell, told the BBC then.       >“The gun at home is the best way to avoid dictatorships—only       >dictators take arms away from the citizens.”       >       >Apparently many of his fellow Swiss agreed. The referendum       >was easily defeated. Gun ownership in the country has deep       >historic roots and it is tied to mandatory military service       >for Swiss men between the ages of 18 and 34. Traditionally,       >soldiers were allowed to keep their weapons at home in order       >to defend against conquering armies. These fears came close       >to being realized during the Franco-Prussian War on 1871; as       >well as World War I, when the Swiss border was threatened;       >and World War II, when the country feared a Nazi invasion.       >       >But guns are popular beyond the military, as well. Children       >as young as 12 are taught how to shoot as well as the rules       >of gun safety, and are encouraged to participate in highly       >popular target-shooting competitions. The country’s cultural       >attachment to firearms resembles America’s in some ways,       >though it has no constitutional right to bear arms—it has       >the third- highest rate of private gun ownership in the       >world, behind the United States and Yemen. Yet Switzerland       >has a low rate of gun crime, and hasn’t seen a mass shooting       >since 2001, when a gunman opened fire in the legislative       >body in the Canton of Zug, killing 14 people, as well as       >himself.       >       >So it’s possible to have widespread gun ownership without so       >frequently seeing the kinds of incidents that the U.S. saw       >on Wednesday, when a gunman killed 17 people at a high       >school in Florida. But how?       >       >For one thing, Switzerland’s rate of gun ownership is still       >substantially lower than America’s—in Switzerland the rate       >is roughly one gun per four people, whereas in the U.S. it’s       >more than one per person, according to GunPolicy.org. The       >Swiss Defense Ministry estimates that there are 2 million       >privately owned weapons in the country of 8.3 million       >people. There are estimated to be 300 million guns in the       >U.S., but 130 million of them are owned by about 3 percent       >of the adult population.       >       >Another way the two countries differ is in their rates of       >gun-related deaths. Swiss gun-related death rates are the       >highest in Europe. The figure for the U.S. is three times       >higher than that for Switzerland. Much of that is       >attributable in both countries to suicide. Mass shootings in       >Switzerland are relatively rare, though, with two in the       >past 20 years. By one estimate, there have been 30 mass       >shootings in the U.S. in 2018 alone, including Wednesday’s       >in Florida—though the number of fatalities in these mass       >shootings is only a small proportion of the overall       >gun-related homicides in the U.S.       >       >The Washington Post offers some reasons why mass shootings       >are more common in the U.S. than in Switzerland:       >       >Swiss authorities have a list of about 2,000 individuals       >they suspect of being willing to commit shootings. All of       >them are frequently approached by authorities, along with       >psychologists, and are forced to hand over their weapons       >immediately or are barred from purchasing new ones.       >       >Some sociologists say that Switzerland's military service       >comes close to an extended background check, too, and that       >the country's education system teaches children early on to       >search for compromises instead of risking open conflicts.       >Hence, while almost every home in Switzerland may have a       >weapon, access is still indirectly regulated and the use of       >weapons usually follows strict societal norms.       >Then there’s the question of what Swiss guns are meant to       >defend against. The Swiss trust their government more than       >citizens of other rich countries trust theirs. So the       >tradition of gun ownership arose more from the historic need       >to protect Switzerland from invaders than from the       >hypothetical need to overthrow a tyrannical government. And       >as Time pointed out in 2012, “the culture of responsibility       >and safety … is anchored in society and passed from       >generation to generation.”       >       >The fundamental difference between Switzerland and the U.S.       >when it comes to buying guns is not the ease of       >purchase—it’s easy in both countries—but the regulations       >that are associated with gun ownership in Switzerland. Most       >firearms, with the exception of fully automatic weapons, are       >legal. But background checks are mandated, which is not       >always the case in the U.S. Heavy machine guns and military       >weapons such as grenade launchers are banned in Switzerland;       >under some circumstances they can be purchased in the U.S.       >Public-carrying permits are issued rarely. Guns can be       >transported, but must remain unloaded at all times when       >they’re not in use.       >       >Hunting weapons must be registered with the local Canton.       >Pistols, rifles, and semiautomatic weapons require a       >license. The paperwork is relatively easy to obtain—and       >Cantons can make exceptions for individuals. (Citizens of       >Albania, Algeria, Sri Lanka, Kosovo, Macedonia, Bosnia and       >Herzegovina, Serbia, and Turkey who live in the country as       >permanent residents are forbidden from buying guns because       >of their nations’ history of civil war.)       >       >Switzerland’s relatively liberal rules may soon face a       >challenge from outside the country’s borders, however. The       >country is a member of the Schengen area, the group of 26       >European countries that allows for the free movement of       >people. Some other members of the Schengen area are also       >members of the European Union (Switzerland is not). Last       >year the EU tightened the restrictions on gun ownership and       >Switzerland, as a member of the Schengen, must bring its       >laws in line with the new regulations by August of this       >year. Swiss gun-rights advocates are already planning a       >legal challenge because, among other things, it revisits the              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca