10b0028c   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics, aus.politics   
   XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: talk.politics.misc, uk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming   
   XPost: alt.atheism, or.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   XPost: sac.politics, alt.politics, uk.politics.misc   
   From: gayrightistsx@yahoomail.com   
      
   >In article   
   >,   
   > "edell@post.com"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> There's not a single mention of "non-binding opinion" in the article.  And   
   >> judges don't issue opinions, they issue rulings.  Mentioning "non-binding   
   >> opinion" is just you farting around with words to make your fat Tubby-   
   loving   
   >> tummy all warm and fuzzy.   
   >   
   >That court can't decide whether a law was violated. The case is   
   >whether a lawyer can be forced to testify despite client-lawyer   
   >privilege. However that privilege doesn't protect planning   
   >crimes. The decision is they were planning a crime and thus no   
   >privilege. The lawyer must testify or face contempt. If they were   
   >planning a crime, the lawyer must testify fully as a witness to   
   >the planning or face contempt.   
   >   
   >This lawyer really screwed up. I doubt anyone will ever hire him   
   >again.   
   >   
      
   More evidence that Trump is a traitor   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)