Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.retirement    |    For seniors: retirement, aging, geronto    |    157,025 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 156,970 of 157,025    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Legislation to eliminate WEP and GPO cle    |
|    14 Nov 24 10:25:58    |
      XPost: alt.government.employees, alt.politics.trump, sac.politics       XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.misc       From: yourdime@outlook.com              The House passed the Social Security Fairness Act Tuesday evening in a       vote of 327 to 75, bringing the removal of the Windfall Elimination       Provision and the Government Pension Offset closer than ever to       reality.              Social Security’s WEP and GPO have been around for decades. The two       provisions reduce and in some cases fully cancel out Social Security       benefits for Civil Service Retirement System annuitants and other       public sector employees who have worked in state and local government,       as well as their spouses, widows and widowers.              The House’s vote came after Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.) and Garret       Graves (R-Pa.), the original cosponsors of the reintroduced Social       Security Fairness Act, filed a discharge petition in September to try       to push the bill toward a vote. About one week later, the petition       reached the 218-signature threshold needed to force the bill to the       House floor.              The legislation will “provide a secure retirement to the hundreds of       thousands of spouses, widows and widowers who are denied their       spouses’ Social Security benefits simply because they chose careers of       service,” Spanberger and Graves said Tuesday in a joint statement.              Through decades of advocacy for a repeal of WEP and GPO, support of the       legislation has continually grown. The House’s version of the Social       Security Fairness Act gained 330 cosponsors this year, making it one of       the most highly supported bills in all of Congress.              The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, which       has been pushing for the bill’s passage for years, said the legislation       has never before made it this far.              “The overwhelming bipartisan support for the Social Security Fairness       Act underscores the urgent need for this legislation, and with       continued advocacy and support, we can bring about the necessary       changes to protect the benefits of our nation’s retired public       servants,” NARFE National President William Shackelford said in a       statement.              Now the legislation faces its next hurdle: passage in the Senate. The       Senate’s companion to the Social Security Fairness Act currently has 62       cosponsors.              “We encourage Senate leadership to build upon this clear momentum,       bring our bipartisan effort up for a vote and deliver retirement       security to Americans who have earned it,” Spanberger and Graves said.              Unlike the House, the Senate does not have a discharge petition       procedure — the strategy that Spanberger and Graves used to force the       floor vote in the House.              “In the Senate, we have the votes to defeat a filibuster, but it has to       be brought to a vote,” John Hatton, NARFE’s staff vice president of       policy and programs, told The Federal Drive with Tom Temin. “But       somebody may object to proceeding, which could cause a two-week or so       delay in getting it through.”              Federal groups, such as the Federal Managers Association, are urging       the Senate to consider the bill before the end of this Congress.              The legislation will “provide this long-overdue relief for the public       servants impacted by the GPO and WEP,” FMA National President Craig       Carter said in a statement. “It is time to retire these provisions to       the dustbin of history for the good of all civil servants who have been       deprived of what they’ve earned for far too long.”              But at the same time, the Senate is facing “must-pass” legislation this       year, including the National Defense Authorization Act and fiscal 2025       appropriations legislation, which is likely to take up a good deal of       lawmakers’ time and attention.              Hatton said the biggest challenge for the Social Security Fairness Act       is “convincing Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and other members of       Senate that this is a priority that needs to get done now.”              Some members of Congress have also looked at alternatives to a full       repeal of WEP and GPO. A couple of other bills aim to change the       benefit calculation rather than entirely revoke the two provisions.       Proponents of those bills raised concerns that a full repeal would       impact Social Security’s solvency, while reforming the calculation       would ensure “equity” between public and private sector workers.              If the Social Security Fairness Act is enacted, there would likely       still be a period of delay before it becomes effective for those       impacted by WEP and GPO.              “The whole thing turns into an operation that Social Security can       execute,” Hatton said. “But it’s unclear how long it would take for the       implementation.”              https://federalnewsnetwork.com/pay-benefits/2024/11/legislation-to-       eliminate-wep-and-gpo-clears-the-house/              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca