XPost: misc.education, soc.bi, misc.kids.health   
   XPost: soc.rights.human   
   From: markprobert17@lumbercartel.com   
      
   "Roger Schlafly"  wrote in message   
   news:Ifqkb.527$LA3.230652966@twister2.starband.net...   
   > "Barbara Schwarz"  wrote   
   > > Yeah, right, Roger, tell that to the terrorists. They see that he is   
   > > CMU educator and say: "Hey, lets use his instructions, they work, he   
   > > is a prof..."   
   >   
   > They work? Just try making a bomb from his instructions. I doubt   
   > that you can do it.   
   >   
   > > >  You can probably find better info at your local library.   
   > > According to our police, the people that set 500 bombs this summer off   
   > > around here, did not go to the library, they downloaded the   
   > > instructions right from websites.   
   >   
   > Where do you have 500 bombs?! Anyway, there are 100s of websites   
   > with better bomb info. I am quite sure your bomber got the info elsewhere.   
   >   
   > > > You have a funny idea about the 1A. The scientologists want to keep   
   > > > their core beliefs a trade secret,   
   > > Scientologists don't promote violence. They don't have bomb   
   > > instructions on their webpages! They don't give advice on how to throw   
   >   
   > Scientologists don't even put their core beliefs on their web pages.   
   > The beliefs are secret! For all I know, their core belief do involve   
   > illegally harassing others.   
      
   That is the problem with keeping secrets, People can believe anything about   
   them. Their assurances do not wash, since, if they did, they would not keep   
   them secret.   
      
   >   
   > > Him sexually harassing me (and I am sure it was him who sent me the   
   > > porn letter) and his porn pictures (as an educator!) on his website,   
   > > his link to the maliciously defamatory Katy Johnson article also shows   
   > > what kind of guy he is.   
   >   
   > So sue him. Scientologists like to sue people, so you might get help.   
      
   That is not their only hobby.   
      
   > The K.J. article is disturbing. I don't know that it is either malicious   
   > or defamatory, but it is unnecessarily embarrassing to the parties   
   involved.   
      
   Uh-oh...more agreement....and I would throw in crass and tacky.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)