XPost: misc.education, soc.bi, misc.kids.health   
   XPost: soc.rights.human   
   From: scarecrow@wicked.witch   
      
   On 20 Oct 2003 09:01:54 -0700, BarbaralovesMarty@excite.com (Barbara   
   Schwarz) wrote:   
      
   >Touretzky is also persecuting religion. That is also a violation of   
   >the First Amendment. He uses pornographic images that have nothing to   
   >do with Scientology to degrade and attack Scientologists. I also did   
   >not see any humor in him sexually harassing me. That is also against   
   >the law.   
      
   No, the Constitution says:   
      
   Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or   
   prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of   
   speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to   
   assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.   
      
   It does not say that individuals cannot object to specific religions   
   or that individuals cannot call a religion a cult or say it is not a   
   religion.  It specifically prohibits the government from making laws   
   that establish a religion or that prevent people from exercising their   
   religion.  Touretsky is not Congress.   
      
      
   --   
   Dorothy   
      
   There is no sound, no cry in all the world   
   that can be heard unless someone listens ..   
      
   The Outer Limits   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)