XPost: misc.education, soc.bi, misc.kids.health
XPost: soc.rights.human
From: markprobert17@lumbercartel.com
"Barbara Schwarz" wrote in message
news:4c418fa.0310220721.184fa21a@posting.google.com...
> "Markasurus Probertasaurus" wrote in
message news:...
> > "Barbara Schwarz" wrote in message
> > news:4c418fa.0310210827.3264b6a7@posting.google.com...
> > > toto wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > > On 20 Oct 2003 09:01:54 -0700, BarbaralovesMarty@excite.com (Barbara
> > > > Schwarz) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Touretzky is also persecuting religion. That is also a violation of
> > > > >the First Amendment. He uses pornographic images that have nothing
to
> > > > >do with Scientology to degrade and attack Scientologists. I also
did
> > > > >not see any humor in him sexually harassing me. That is also
against
> > > > >the law.
> > > >
> > > > No, the Constitution says:
> > > >
> > > > Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or
> > > > prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
> > > > speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
> > > > assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of
grievances.
> > > >
> > > > It does not say that individuals cannot object to specific religions
> > > > or that individuals cannot call a religion a cult or say it is not a
> > > > religion. It specifically prohibits the government from making laws
> > > > that establish a religion or that prevent people from exercising
their
> > > > religion. Touretsky is not Congress.
> > >
> > > Yes, thanks heaven he is not!
> >
> > Good thing you did not say "Thank G-d." You know what the late and never
> > great L. Ron said about that.
> >
> > > Touretzky is actively persecuting Scientologists that they have
> > > problems to freely exercise their religion.
> >
> > Sure. They have no trouble practising their non-religion. It is the
criminal
> > enetrprise aspect of $cientology that has problems.
> >
> > His and other people's
> > > hate propaganda destroys families of Scientologists. I know a lot
> > > about that, trust me.
> >
> > Why? So far, you have engaged solely in personal attacks and have yet to
> > provide independent documentation of any of your clams.
> >
> > > He tries to scare their families,
> >
> > Wrong. He shows them what $cientology is, and, since it is scary, they
> > become scared.
> >
> > and they then
> > > come up with criminal methods to get Scientologists kidnapped and
> > > "deprogrammed".
> >
> > Thank G-d.
> >
> > > This kind of fear by family members which read and
> > > believe the propaganda is spread all over the world, and
> > > Scientologists have to suffer. Scientologists don't get jobs, can't
> > > join political party, are discriminated against, etc. It is really
> > > bad.
> >
> > Not in the US. We are behind the times, and should catch up.
>
>
> You don't know much about Scientology. You just buy the German
> propaganda lines. All you are is a SCN basher who hasn't got his facts
> straight, and you promote even criminal kidnapping and
> "deprogramming". I was subjected to such inhumane abuse. Do you know
> how terrible it is and what scars remain? With each successful
> "deprogramming" (mine wasn't, it was just brutal) the "deprogrammer"
> create a new criminal.
What about the mind stealing that goes on when people are recruited into the
Kriminal Kult? What about the murder of Lise Macpherson? Hmmm????
> Read series "Barbara Schwarz reveals shocking news", some 84
> installments, posted on Google. And as personal attacks are concerned,
> it seems one of you specialties.
Well, you finally got one right. I am very good at personal attacks (and,
with you, I have been my kindest, most loveable, self), but, I base them on
your behavior and utterings, not some imaginary problems, as you do. That
makes a big difference.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
