XPost: alt.education, alt.education.alternative, alt.education.research   
   XPost: misc.education   
   From: jrredford@yahoo.com   
      
   On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 14:29:54 -0500, Gray Shockley   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 08:49:56 -0500, James Redford wrote:   
   >   
   >> Those who control the U.S. government didn't just know in advance and   
   >> intentionally let the 9/11 attacks happen as a Hegelian dialectical   
   >> PsyOp in order to obtain more power and control--they funded,   
   >> shepherded, trained and protected the terrorists every step of the   
   >> way. They didn't just intentionally let it happen: they made it   
   >> happen.   
   >>   
   >> The below article by Dr. Tim Howells is a very good, short   
   >> introduction to just some of the more damning mainstream major media   
   >> articles and U.S. government primary documentation which proves up one   
   >> side and down the other that the 9/11 attacks and the following   
   >> anthrax attacks were a Hegelian dialectical . . .   
   >   
   >[rest deleted because I'm not interested in reading the magnus   
   >whatssis until my question is answered]   
   >   
   >"a Hegelian dialectical", eh?   
   >   
   >Please explain /exactly/ what a "Hegelian dialectic" is.   
      
   A dialectical scheme developed by the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm   
   Friedrich Hegel (b. Aug. 27, 1770, Stuttgart, Württemberg--d. Nov. 14,   
   1831, Berlin) that emphasized the progress of history and of ideas   
   from thesis to antithesis and thence to a synthesis.   
      
   For Hegel, there is a unifying metaphysical process underlying the   
   apparent diversity of the world, which he called the dialektische.   
   This process is essentially the necessary emergence of higher and more   
   adequate entities out of a conflict between their less developed and   
   less adequate anticipations. This process can be seen to be operating   
   both at the most abstract levels of thought as well as at the level of   
   simple phenomena. So, e.g., at the most abstract level of thought,   
   pure "being" (the thesis in this particular dialectical progression),   
   because it is pure indeterminacy, can be seen to imply its opposite,   
   "nothingness" (the antithesis). However, the truth about these   
   concepts must contain both being and nothingness. This truth is the   
   interaction or movement between being and nothingness which is   
   "becoming" (the synthesis).   
      
   >And from /precisely/ where in which of Hegel's works.   
      
   Encyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1817).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)