home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.college      Colleges and universities (general)      679 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 63 of 679   
   Rasta Robert to All   
   Re: Abuse complaints filed with Geocitie   
   11 Oct 03 16:29:53   
   
   XPost: alt.religion.scientology, alt.education   
   From: rr@dds.nl.ReMoVeThIs   
      
   On 10 Oct 2003 10:14:02 -0700, BarbaralovesMarty@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz)   
   wrote in alt.religion.scientology:   
      
   >rr@dds.nl.ReMoVeThIs (Rasta Robert) wrote in message news:<3f86   
   c50.51038623@news.cistron.nl>...   
   >> On 9 Oct 2003 09:04:31 -0700, BarbaralovesMarty@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz)   
   >> wrote in alt.religion.scientology:   
   >>   
   >> >rr@dds.nl.ReMoVeThIs (Rasta Robert) wrote in message news:<3   
   84a7e4.28739536@news.cistron.nl>...   
   >> >> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:40:42 +0200, "Nessie"   
   >> >>  wrote in alt.religion.scientology:   
   >>   
   >> >> >Must be a piece of cake for OSA to get hold of some invoices   
   >> >> >in a sex shop.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> They could have ordered some stuff at the porn shop themselves and   
   >> >> altered the client info I suppose.   
   >> >   
   >> >And how do you "smart" people explain the porn on Touretzky's website?   
   >>   
   >> It's discutable if that can be called 'porn'.  Can't really imagine   
   >> someone would be turned on by it.   
   >   
   >Oh man! I can't believe I am in this discussion. Now listen carefully   
   >to me, Rasta Robert. The definition of porno is not being "turned on"   
   >by something. The definition of porn is perverted sexual behavior and   
   >pictures, and that is exactly the kind of photos that Touretzky took   
   >and put on his website! He is twisted like hell and he must be turned   
   >on by them, otherwise he would not put them up or probably posed   
   >himself for it.   
   >   
      
   Wrong Barbara, we get nowhere if you start to use your own private   
   interpretations/definitions of words instead of the established/common   
   meaning/definition.  The definition of porn is precisely that it is   
   only meant to 'turn on' a persons sexual desire and has no other value.   
      
   PORN   
   Pronunciation: powrn   
   WordNet Dictionary Definition: [n]  creative activity (writing or pictures   
   or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate   
   sexual desire Synonyms: porno, pornography   
      
   PERVERTED   
   Pronunciation: pur'vurtid   
   Matching Terms: Perverter   
   WordNet Dictionary Definition: 1[adj]  marked by immorality; deviating from   
   what is considered right or proper or good; "depraved criminals"; "a perverted   
   sense of loyalty"; "the reprobate conduct of a gambling aristocrat"   
   2[adj]  having an intended meaning altered or misrepresented; "many of the   
   facts seemed twisted out of any semblance to reality"; "a perverted translation   
   of the poem"   
   3[adj]  (used of sexual behavior) "kinky sex"; "perverted practices"   
      
   OBSCENE   
   Pronunciation: ub'seen   
   Matching Terms: obscenely, obscenity   
   WordNet Dictionary Definition: 1[adj]  suggestive of or tending to moral   
   looseness; "lewd whisperings of a dirty old man"; "an indecent gesture";   
   "obscene telephone calls"; "salacious limericks"   
   2[adj]  designed to incite to indecency or lust; "the dance often   
   becomes flagrantly obscene"- Margaret Mead   
   3[adj]  offensive to the mind; "an abhorrent deed"; "the obscene massacre   
   at Wounded Knee"; "morally repugnant customs"; "repulsive behavior"; "the   
   most repulsive character in recent novels"   
      
   >>   
   >> >How did that get there? He was forced by OSA to put it there, right?   
   >>   
   >> Don't think so.  What you call porn was put up as a form of gross   
   >> satire on the scientology e-meter, most probably by himself.   
   >   
   >He likely is the guy who took the photos and is also the male   
   >porn-"star" of the pictures. And what is that? A religious object   
   >disgraced is what you call a "satire"? The e-meter is used for   
   >auditing, not for any sexual activities!   
      
   It's probably not really an e-meter in the pictures (I didn't really   
   study them exhaustively though), but some people use electro-stimulation   
   sex toys (seem to be espacially popular in BDSM circles).   
   I think your phantasy is flying off with you when you believe David   
   Touretzky made those pictures.   
      
   >I never have witnessed any   
   >porn activities within any Scientology org.   
      
   No but OSA is know to have set up situations to frame people   
   in intricate ways.   
      
   >Those pictures are made by   
   >Touretzky, and he used his sex shop purchases for it. Furthermore,   
   >with him degrading the e-meter, he is degrading and attacking the   
   >religion Scientology, and he is in violation with constitutional and   
   >other laws. That man has no decency inside him, and neither do you.   
      
   Oh come on, you are so quick to acuse anyone who you imagine to be   
   against you or who dares to disagree with you or give you critical   
   comment.   
      
   >Would you like Touretzky using Rastahair draped around, you know what,   
   >or hanging over the naked fat girl in a perverted sexual picture or   
   >would you be deeply offended by that?   
      
   I don't think I would be that offended.  My believes are not so shaky   
   that something like that would bother me.  By the way, did you know   
   there is a band with the name 'Dreadlock Pussy'?  Would I have to be   
   'deeply offended' by that?  I am responsible for my own feelings,   
   not for the actions of others, so I don't have to let it offend me.   
   It doesn't feel good to feel offended, it is a form of shutting   
   oneself off from the universal intellgence.  Letting external   
   influences determine how to feel sounds similar to me as what   
   in scientology terms could be called not being free of the reactive   
   mind.  Not being able to intervene, or to be at cause of how one feels,   
   but being 'at effect', having an automatic emotional reaction   
   to an external stimulus.  Isn't dianetics/scientology supposed to get rid   
   of that?   
      
   >> >Give me a break! You guys should be concerned about that woman that   
   >> >Touretzky fixed up with those sex chains. How about investigating how   
   >> >old she is, and if she is a student of CMU, Lise?   
   >>   
   >> I don't think he made those photos himself but found them on the   
   >> internet somewhere.   
   >   
   >Yeah right! Who knows, one day the woman will come forward, or David   
   >Touretzky will be ordered by a court to be examed, who know where, and   
   >we will all know, that he was the porn-director and the porn-"star".   
      
   What you think you know does not have to be the truth, as long as you   
   can not prove it, you just jump to the conclusion that some suspicion   
   you have must be true and will not concider that as long as you don't   
   really know for sure there are several different possible explanations   
   that could equally be true.  This makes you inflexible and might mean   
   that you're getting yourself in some trouble which is mostly of your   
   own making.  But you don't seem to realise how you are tricking yourself.   
   You must be quite a good good trickster to do that in such a masterly   
   fashion.   
      
   Rasta Robert   
     --//->   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca