Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.college    |    Colleges and universities (general)    |    679 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 679 of 679    |
|    useapen to All    |
|    Bakersfield College can't fire professor    |
|    22 Feb 26 07:55:12    |
      XPost: alt.politics.equality, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns       XPost: sac.politics, alt.politics       From: yourdime@outlook.com              FRESNO, Calif. (CN) — A federal judge ruled Friday that a community       college can’t fire or discipline a professor for his opposition to       policies promoting diversity, equity and inclusion — commonly referred to       as DEI — but it can require the teacher to take mandatory DEI training as       a requirement to participate on faculty screening committees.              The ruling is temporary, since it came in the form of a preliminary       injunction, meaning the case is active and can still proceed to trial.              Daymon Johnson is a history professor and leader of the Renegade Institute       for Liberty, a right-wing faculty coalition that claims to stand for       “diversity of thought and intellectual literacy through the free and open       discourse of American ideals.” The former leader of the group, Matthew       Garrett, a tenured professor of history and vocal critic of DEI policies       spreading across the Kern Community College District, was fired in 2023.       Garrett sued the district, which later agreed to settle the case for $2.4       million. Apparently fearing he’d be next on the chopping block, Johnson       also sued, rather preemptively.              “Bakersfield College has already subjected Professor Johnson to a lengthy       and intrusive investigation merely for criticizing and questioning a       colleague’s views on RIFL’s Facebook page,” Johnson wrote in the most       recent version of his civil complaint. “Although it ultimately cleared       Professor Johnson of violating any actual rules, the process was the       punishment.”              In the suit, Johnson claims he’s afraid to express his beliefs, both       online and on campus, for fear of “being subjected to further       investigations and termination.”              Diversity, equity and inclusion — sometimes paired with “accessibility”       and called DEIA — is a broad set of policies and goals that have been       adopted by a wide range of state and local governments, universities and       businesses. They might include diversity goals for hiring and sensitivity       training, or more controversial measures like unconscious bias training.       Johnson and Garrett say DEI represents a sort of “groupthink” that       pressures everyone to conform to left-wing ideologies or be forever       branded a racist.              While DEI policies were all the rage in the years following the George       Floyd protests in 2020, they have fallen out of fashion since President       Donald Trump outlawed them in the public sector at the beginning of his       second term and started accusing private employers of discrimination       against white people. Diversity targets have also been the subject of       numerous lawsuits, particularly in California.              “The state has recently doubled down on its commitment to the ‘diversity’       and ‘antiracist’ ideologies by adopting a set of regulations that command       faculty to adhere to and implement these ideologies, in their very       concepts of self and in every facet of their existence on campus,       including in their curriculum and pedagogy,” Johnson wrote in his       complaint. “Obedience to the state’s pervasive, all-encompassing political       cult is now required to teach, work or lead within California’s community       colleges.”              In 2024, a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit for lack of standing, since       Johnson had yet to experience any of the harms he was suing over. But       three-judge panel from the Ninth Circuit revived the lawsuit last year on       appeal, finding the teacher had “adequately alleged a ‘credible threat’ of       enforcement.”              On Friday, U.S. District Judge Kirk Sherriff, who had previously dismissed       the case, handed Johnson another partial victory, temporarily enjoining       Bakersfield College “from investigating, disciplining or terminating       Johnson … based on Johnson’s proposed social or political speech.”              “Johnson has shown that his intended speech would be in his capacity as a       professor and would concern matters related to scholarship or teaching, or       that it would be in his off duty capacity as a private citizen (including       as a public academic),” Sherriff wrote in his 27-page ruling.              The ruling did not, however, “preclude defendants from requiring that       Johnson take Bakersfield College’s mandatory DEIA training to be eligible       to serve on a faculty screening committee, and it does not apply to       official speech as a faculty screening committee member.”              “As Johnson adamantly maintains that he will not take the DEIA training       that is a prerequisite for service on a faculty screening committee, he       fails to show a likelihood that he would serve on such a committee,” the       Joe Biden appointee wrote.              https://www.courthousenews.com/bakersfield-college-cant-fire-professor-       for-anti-dei-beliefs/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca