XPost: misc.education, soc.bi, misc.kids.health
XPost: soc.rights.human
From: markprobert16@lumbercartel.com
"Nick" wrote in message
news:243b3cd7.0310161744.25b91455@posting.google.com...
> BarbaralovesMarty@excite.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message
news:<4c418fa.0310160903.154fd22d@posting.google.com>...
> > "Jeff" wrote in message
news:...
> > > "Barbara Schwarz" wrote in message
> > > news:8385d874.0310150715.3e76854e@posting.google.com...
> > > > WARNING
> > >
> > > (Garbage deleted)
> > >
> > > Ever hear of the freedom of speech?
> > >
> > > Everything on that site is publically available.
> > >
> > > Have a good day.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> >
> > Jeff, there are limitations to freedom of speech. Sexual harassment is
> > no freedom of speech, and telling people how to make bombs is no
> > freedom of speech either, because people may have to die as a result
> > of that information.
> >
> > This earth is not a sane place. Even if you put a little note
> > underneath your bomb instructions and information about how to throw
> > bombs in police cars, that people should not do that, Dave Touretzky,
> > you, and anybody else knows that there are numerous people who just
> > want to blow up others and they screw the law and warnings. Touretzky
> > claims no responsibilty for what other crazy people construct and
> > build after the instructions on his website, but he tells them how to
> > do that. What a dangerous snake!
> >
> > Only because there are also other criminals out there who tell
> > terrorists on the web how to blow up things and people, doesn't mean
> > for Touretzky, a university educator (!) to act same reckless.
> >
> > I also remind you that the young man who had the same bomb
> > instructions on his website was arrested by the FBI. His website was
> > removed. What do you think makes Touretzky innocent by putting that
> > dangerous stuff back on his site?
> >
> > There are millions of example in which Touretzky could make his point
> > on freedom of speech. Endangering other peoples'lives and degrading
> > others through sexual perversions, persecuting religion, are the worst
> > examples!
> >
> > Anyway, Jeff, if you, or anybody you love will be disabled or killed
> > through a bomb that was build after Touretzky's or another madman's
> > instructions, you will be a changed man. You will regret your words
> > that freedom of speech should allow detailed information on how to
> > build and throw bombs. The world is too crazy for that information,
> > how come you have not noticed that?
> >
> > The right to live unharmed is a constituional right that is superior
> > to freedom of speech. If freedom of speech harms or endangers the
> > constitutional right of people to live a peaceful and happy life, you
> > can't say it. It would be unconstitutional. Touretzky's bomb
> > instructions are unconstitutional because he endangers other
> > constitutional rights. His persecution of religion also violates the
> > First Amendment.
> >
> > Barbara Schwarz
>
> Barbara, I agree with your concern. I think that freedom of speech can
> go a little too far. If "Freedom of Speach" allows people to promote
> criminal behavior, easily accessed to ALL ages, then there is
> something terribly wrong with our society. And people actually
> allowing it, and standing up for it is sickening to me. We have been
> fighting to keep terrorists out of our country, while our own citizens
> are standing up for people who have no respect for human life, and
> glorify the terror.
>
> It is sad how people can be so dillusional.
How sickening it is to see that somone would not understand the concept the
freedom of speech applies more to unacceptable speech than it does to
acceptable speech.
Spend some time in a foxhole.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
