[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>that would show due process is not required.   
   >>     I am aware of the rule of expedited removal. Expedited removal   
   >>was codified in IIRIRA in 1996 as an amendment to the INA. And it   
   >>requires the alien be apprehended within 100 miles of the border and   
   >>have been present in the country for less than 14 days. Sadly, many   
   >>deportees who are not given due process do not meet these   
   >>requirements, making the rule of expedited removal irrelevant.   
   >   
   >This entire immigration process needs to be changed and new   
   >laws need to be enacted to reflect the reality of the   
   >situation.   
      
        Lobby to get the changes you believe are needed.   
      
   >If a person does not have legal status to be in   
   >the country they are subject to immediate deportation and no   
   >laborious court procedure should be  required.   
      
        The Constitution requires it.   
      
   >Only their   
   >status should be determined as easily and quickly as   
   >possible.   
      
        Which is what deportation hearings are for. But they're not being   
   used. People are just deported based solely on accusations.   
      
   >Plus there should be severe limits to persons and   
   >departments who can grant any temporary exemptions, starting   
   >with the elimination of the state department.   
      
        You do realize this means an end to DHS, ICE, and boarder patrol.   
   An odd position for someone who wants them to have open permission to   
   do as they wish in regards to deportation.   
        I do hope I simply misunderstand what you're presenting.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)