home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.culture.irish      More than just beating up your relatives      96,488 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,606 of 96,488   
   Hunter Biden to Peeler   
   Re: Leftists suck cock and molest childr   
   12 Apr 21 05:41:42   
   
   XPost: uk.legal, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.democrats   
   XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities   
   From: invalid@dont-email.me   
      
   In article    
   Peeler  wrote:   
   >   
   > Because you ARE a total retard?   
   >   
   > You bet!   
   >   
   > --   
   > Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:   
   > "A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's   
   > youngsters 'mature'."   
   > MID:    
      
   DEMOCRATS DEFINE CHILD MOLESTERS AS GAY   
      
   Catholic League president Bill Donohue explains this unusual   
   headline:   
      
   “The House of Representatives will vote this week, possibly   
   tomorrow, on a hate crimes bill championed by gay groups that   
   includes pedophiles under the rubric of sexual orientation. This   
   is the ultimate confession: liberal Democrats think of   
   pedophiles as indistinguishable from homosexuals.   
      
   “When this subject came up last week in the House Judiciary   
   Committee, an amendment to the hate crimes bill that would have   
   excluded pedophilia from the definition of sexual orientation   
   was defeated by Democrats along party lines, 13-10. This was   
   considered good news by gay organizations like the Human Rights   
   Campaign, left-wing groups like the ACLU and various Jewish   
   groups like the ADL.   
      
   “The debate is over: for liberals, child molesters should be   
   given the same rights as homosexuals. Moreover, they should be   
   given more rights than pregnant women and veterans; the latter   
   two categories were explicitly denied coverage under the hate   
   crimes bill. Even worse, an amendment that would bar prosecution   
   based in whole or in part on religious beliefs quoted from the   
   Bible, the Tanakh (Judaism’s sacred book) or the Koran was   
   defeated by Democrats along party lines, 11-8. In other words,   
   religious speech may be denied First Amendment protection.   
      
   “There would be national outrage over this if the media were to   
   report on it and the public were allowed to weigh in on it. But   
   the clock is ticking and freedom and morality are hanging in the   
   balance.”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca