XPost: misc.immigration.usa, alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics   
   From: lscott@oui.fr   
      
   On 11/25/2024 8:22 AM, Niocláiſín Cóilín de Ġloſtéir wrote:   
   > Dear useapen :   
   >   
   > (Alpine refuses to post to sac.politics via Eternal September - perhaps   
   > it is a misspelling of soc.politics.)   
      
   Parent article contains sac.politics, Ray Banana @ES has probably   
   screwed up his filtering again.   
   > I had written to the Institute of Strategic Dialogue because Aoife   
   > Gallagher thereof publishes lies on behalves of disinformations on   
   > behalves of murders. I have not gotten an answer from the Institute of   
   > Strategic Dialogue.   
   >   
   > However I do believe what she says in   
   > news:XnsB235CC178273BX@135.181.20.170   
   >   
   > On   
   > Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:43:06 +0000   
   > I emailed an ISDGlobal.org email address with   
   > Subject: faoi Uisce Faoi Thalamh agus bréaga nuachtán   
   > . . .   
   > "A Aoife ní nó uí Gallchóir agus a Chiaráin uí Conchúir agus a dhaoine   
   > uaisle ag Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian agus a dhaoine uaisle ag an   
   > Aontas Eorpach, a chairde,   
   >   
   > Thosaigh mise iarratais sonraí oraibh ar an 28/11/2023. Fanaim le gach   
   > freagra dtaobhanna fós.   
   >   
   > Tá an mhoill Shasanach seo in aghaidh dlí, dar leis an Acuity Law Limited.   
   >   
   > "You can complain to the ICO about the way an organisation has handled   
   > personal information.   
   >   
   > In most cases, before you complain to us you need to have:   
   >   
   > complained directly to the organisation;   
   > [. . .] and   
   > followed up with the organisation if you have not received a response   
   > after 30 days."   
   > arsa   
   > HTTPS://ICO.org.uk/make-a-complaint/data-protection-complaints   
   what-to-expect/   
   >   
   > Déanaigí freagraí agus ceartúcháin!   
   >   
   > Is mise le fírinníbh,   
   > Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester"   
   >   
   > On   
   > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:32:41 +0100   
   > I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address with   
   > Subject: Re: ICO Case Reference: IC-282358-B2L2   
   > . . .   
   > "Dear Mister [Stuart] Brierley,   
   >   
   > [. . .]   
   >   
   > Mistranslations are certainly lethal.   
   >   
   > Is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue exempt de laws? E.g. complicity   
   > in murders and torture? E.g. I still do not have a response de it."   
   >   
   > On   
   > Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:42:40 +0100   
   > I emailed an ICO.org.UK email address:   
   > "Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:"Thank you for the   
   > complaint that you submitted to the Information   
   > Commissioner’s Office in relation to the Institute for Strategic   
   > Dialogue regarding concerns that you have about how the organisation has   
   > processed your personal data."   
   >   
   >   
   > Dear Sir/Madam,   
   >   
   > Thanks for responding and for asking for more informations. I am sorry   
   > that I failed to make this complaint clear enough at the start. I   
   > attempt to make progress towards clarity via this email.   
   >   
   >   
   > Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:   
   > "Please note that it is also ICO procedure that we do not   
   > handle complaints which concern issues that the organisation has not   
   > themselves first been given the opportunity to resolve.   
   >   
   > [. . .]   
   >   
   > As such, if you have not taken your concerns to the organisation we ask   
   > that you do so before returning this matter to the ICO. If you have done   
   > so, we ask that you provide evidence of this correspondence and any   
   > response that you received."   
   >   
   >   
   > I never get an answer from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, so in   
   > response to a question which you had asked when I had started this   
   > complaint ("What are the details of your complaint?"), I had ticked:   
   > "I've not received a response from the organisation."   
   >   
   > I had emailed [. . .]@ISDGlobal.org without an answer on 28/11/2023. Cf.   
   > 2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt   
   >   
   > The return receipt that is named   
   > 2023-11-28h_cruthu_seachadta.txt   
   > proves that the Institute for Strategic Dialogue got   
   > 2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt   
   >   
   > Similarly   
   > 2024-01-03a_followed_up_with_the_organisation_if_you_have_not_   
   eceived_a_response_after_30_days.txt   
   > and   
   > 2024-01-04a_focal_ar_iarraidh.txt   
   > and   
   > 2024-01-04f_cruthu_seachadta.txt   
   >   
   >   
   > Mister Stuart Brierley emailed on 13/06/2024:   
   > "After considering all aspects of your complaint, and examining all   
   > evidence that you have provided, the ICO is writing to you today to   
   > request further information from you before we process your complaint   
   > further.   
   >   
   > We note that you complaint concerns “front page libels: malicious   
   > falsehoods, misuses of private and confidential informations” and we   
   > have examined the supporting evidence that you have attached to your   
   > complaint form.   
   >   
   > We note that as stated above, your complaint relates to the Institute of   
   > Strategic Dialogue, a non-profit think tank, however none of the   
   > evidence you have provided appears to relate to such.   
   >   
   > Instead, the evidence you have provided consists of an e-mail to a   
   > company based in Portugal and documents pertaining to two court cases,   
   > both of which relate to different organisations and neither to the   
   > Institute for Strategic Dialogue.   
   >   
   > As such, we are writing to ask that you respond to this e-mail   
   > clarifying as to how this matter relates to the organisation in   
   > question."   
   >   
   >   
   > I apparently failed to convey the role of the ISD to you when I uploaded   
   > 2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf   
   > when I uploaded to you on 16/01/2024:   
   > "In the British Isles there are front-page libels; malicious falsehoods;   
   > misuses of private and confidential informations; breaches against   
   > confidence and datum-protection legislation & the Communications Act   
   > 2003; harassments by publications; & intentional inflictions of mental   
   > harm coverings up this torture and other Portuguese crimes against me   
   > and other migrants. They contradict final unappealable judgments &   
   > proofs. A London organisation perpetrates disinformations on behalves de   
   > these presstitutes and torturers. It is funded by a Portuguese   
   > organisation. It dishonestly pretends that it is against disinformation.   
   > It publishes false reports on a website. It appears on TV and radio.   
   > Illegal disinformations (which caused 3 murders and torture and   
   > persecutions) which are libels and malicious falsehoods against me exist   
   > because of this Portuguese organisation and are essential to the   
   > cover-up by this London organisation that I am complaining to you about.   
   > [. . .]"   
   >   
   > I regret to remark that you have responded in English even though I had   
   > uploaded   
   > 2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf   
   > and   
   > 2023-11-28a_email_to_Calouste_Gulbenkian_Foundation.txt   
   > in Gaelic to you.   
   >   
   > 2023-10-21_particulars_of_claim.pdf   
   > and   
   > 2023-09-24a_HC54_Foirm_1_Bileog_Faisneise_Retraction_Watch.pdf   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)