home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.culture.japan      More than just weird schoolgirl porn      64,573 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 62,705 of 64,573   
   Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Phi to vito   
   Re: The Korean crisis can easily be trac   
   10 Sep 16 20:14:34   
   
   From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com   
      
   On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 9:55:57 PM UTC-4, vito wrote:    
   > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT), "Wise TibetanMonkey, Most    
   > Humble Philosopher"  wrote:    
   >    
   > >On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 2:05:40 PM UTC-4, Milky Way wrote:    
   > >> On Saturday, September 10, 2016 at 10:06:01 AM UTC-7, Wise TibetanMonkey,   
   Most Humble Philosopher wrote:    
   > >> > Remember the "axis of evil"? We attacked the weakest link in the chain,   
   and let the other two prosper and multiply. Was that smart?    
   > >>    
   > >> What "Korean crisis?"    
   > >>    
   > >> You got a lot of 'splaining to do, Lucy.    
   > >>    
   > >> But spare us the philosophy, wise guy.    
   > >    
   > >The Korean crisis: the North blames the South, the South blames the North,   
   but the experts blame the Iraqi war.    
   > >    
   > >Whose idea was it? God spoke in the ear of a president, and the rest is   
   history. Yes, god is to blame.    
   >    
   >    
   > As usual ....    
   >    
   > There is no Korean crisis.    
      
   "Korean crisis" is an understatement. It's a crisis that spills over into   
   China, Russia and Japan, indeed threatening with a major international   
   catastrophe.    
      
   >    
   > China doesn't want its people to see how much better capitalism works    
   > by having a prosperous South Korea next door so they keep a nutter in    
   > power in North Korea.  Otherwise there'd be no North Korea.  Blame    
   > Truman if you must.    
   >    
   > We continue to concede to China because we owe them so much money and    
   > we owe them so much money because our government keeps supporting    
   > people who refuse to work. Otherwise, we'd park a couple destroyers    
   > just outside their waters and whack every missile they launched - or,    
   > better yet, whack Kim. Who to blame for that?  Look in any mirror.    
      
   I doubt is playing with fire when they can get caught in the fire. Indeed they   
   may have some sentimental attachment to Korea, but they are full blown   
   capitalists by now. The least they want is the West stop consuming their   
   goods. They can't afford that.    
      
   >    
   > Bush's blunder in the Middle East, compounded by Obama, et al, has    
   > little of nothing to do with Korea.  Did you know we were destroying a    
   > bunch of lethal gas projectiles?  If we had any sense we'd 'destroy'    
   > them in ISIL strongholds.  But that might hurt somebody's feelings.    
      
   Blame the political elites for their greed. They paint it nice with   
   "globalization" but it's pure greed and expansion. Iraq was part of that   
   expansion but it went wrong. Things could have gone right after the demise of   
   the USSR but it didn't. Kim is    
   feeding his ego, just like GWB did. It feels good to be powerful. Obama just   
   added to the chaos. Putin looks good by comparison.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca