XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.korean
XPost: soc.culture.australian, soc.culture.russian, rec.sport.tennis
XPost: soc.culture.afghanistan
From: acoustic@panix.com
In article <831b40f6-0515-43df-b786-baf750c948cf@googlegroups.com>,
rst9 wrote:
>On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 2:00:53 AM UTC-7, Force Sin wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 9:31:57 AM UTC+8, rst9 wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Uncle Sam will not nuke North Korea.
>>
>> Many Americans at home...foolishly hold the same opinion as you that
>...the US Generals will not attack North Korea...
>
>U.S. politicians and generals are not fools. North Korea has nuclear
>weapons and missiles. That IS a deterent for any nation thinking of
>attacking North Korea.
But what about THAAD - a weapon that your former employer has a part
in developing, and more?
If we could launch a strike on targets and destroy them before they
can react, then not even China or Russia have deterrents - not to
mention North Korea, which haven't had done hardly any testing on its
missile launching system.
So, I argue that North Korea may not have a deterent, if the THAAD
that we sent to S Korea is working as advertised, although there are
still the well-known "25 million reasons" for any sane politician in
Washington not to attack NK.
But our Force Sin is talking about the generals - whom we did not
elect and to whom excessive responsibility and decision-making power
have now been apparently given by the C-in-C.
lo yeeOn
>
>>
>> The US generals are itching to stop Kim before he can successfully
>develop ICBMs that can reach mainland USA.
>
>North Korea has ICBMs to reach South Korea, Japan, and Guam, Okinawa,...
>That should be enough deterent to stop the U.S.
>
>> How do they stop Kim...most like they will use the Tomahawk cruise
>missiles to hit at N Korea's arsenals..just like what they have done in
>Syria...
>
>One nuke, and those ships, Tomahawks will be gone...
>
>> and will use the MOAB to hit the underground storage to destroy Kim's
>nuke bombs...just like what they have done in Afghanistan.
>
>North Korea has surface to air missiles. A cargo plane will be a dead-duck.
>
>>
>> Do you think...the US missiles and MOABs will be able to destroy all
>the nuclear arsenals which are hidden in deep caves and reinforced
>bunkers all over N Korea ?
>
>North Korea is NOT Syria. North Korea has nuclear weapons and ICBMs,
>surface-to-air missiles....
>
>> Like what happened in Syria...(the US missiles FAILED to take out any
>of Assad Chemical weapons)...the chances the same will happened in N
>Korea...is almost a certainty.
>
>No, North Korea has means to fight back, unlike Syria.
>
>>
>> As he had repeatedly promised...(if attacked by the USA), Kim will
>nuke US bases in Japan, S Korea and Guam.
>
>A real possibility.
>
>> When this happened...do you think Trump will not nuke N Korea in return ?
>
>Then, it's the start of WWIII.
>
>> (The USA has nuked civilians in cities before...do you think...Trump
>will now chicken out..let Kim nuked and killed tens of thousands US
>troop...dare not retaliate in kind.)
>
>Kim Jong Un will not use his nukes unless he has to. When he has to, it
>means WWIII is on.
>
>>
>> If you thinks so, you don't know your president and US generals!
>
>Donald Trump and the generals can not use nukes, too.
>The general public will not allow the U.S. to nuke first.
>
>>
>> > This is only a costly exercise of futility for Uncle Sam. North
>Korea is well capable of defending itself. Uncle Sam is not foolish
>enough to send over 5,000 to 6,000 sailors to their deaths, plus
>millions of deaths and trillions of destruction in South Korea and
>Japan.
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
