From: rking164@comcast.net   
      
   On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 11:34:07 AM UTC-5, Lazarus Cain wrote:   
   > Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary   
   Weapons prohibits, in all circumstances, making the civilian population as   
   such, individual civilians or civilian objects, the object of attack by any   
   weapon or munition which is    
   primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons   
   through the action of flame, heat or a combination thereof, produced by a   
   chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target. The protocol also   
   prohibits the use of air-   
   delivered incendiary weapons against military targets within a concentration   
   of civilians, and limits the use of incendiary weapons delivered by other   
   means. Forest and other plants may not be a target unless they are used to   
   conceal combatants or other    
   military objectives.[2][9] Protocol III lists certain munition types like   
   smoke shells which only have a secondary or additional incendiary effect;   
   these munition types are not considered to be incendiary weapons.   
      
   Sort of applies to firebombing and nuclear   
      
   Do any nukes have any chance damaging civilians if used   
   Are US and Russia both in violation of Protocol III by having nuclear weapons   
   in active arsenal?   
   As we see, these protocols or prohibitions only apply when convenient   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)