XPost: aus.politics, uk.legal, soc.culture.russia   
   XPost: alt.russia   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   The accompanying letter dated 18 SEPTEMBER 2019 conveys a summary of   
   details concerning my attend[ing] at the SALE MAGISTRATES COURT of that   
   same today in relation to an APPLICATION FOR AN INTERVENTION AND   
   PERSONAL SAFTEY ORDER as CASE NUMBER K12264616 DATED 30 AUGUST 2019   
   relating to a PERSON depicted within the numerous PHOTOGRAPHS (provided   
   to yourselves as the person known to me) pertaining to the FACTUAL and   
   SUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS for the seeking of those ORDERS as ANALOGIES OF   
   EXPERIENCE detailed below relating to the STAR HOTEL SALE which are of a   
   sufficient gravitas as prohibited behaviour.   
      
   In order to satisfy the APPLICATION requirements related to the IDENTITY   
   of PERSONS habitually engaged within prohibited behaviour within   
   proximity to the STAR HOTEL SALE, a registration search for DIRECTOR AND   
   SECRETARY details of an AUSTRALIAN COMPANY was made: MICHAMAK ACN 613   
   074 543 with the AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION. Since   
   MICHAEL JOHN GILMARTIN as the DIRECTOR / SECRETARY for the STAR HOTEL   
   SALE was not the person depicted within the PHOTOGRAPHS (provided to   
   yourselves as the person known to me), accordingly an application was   
   made to the COURT to have this matter STRUCK OUT.   
      
   That MICHAEL JOHN GILMARTIN as the DIRECTOR / SECRETARY for the STAR   
   HOTEL SALE whilst within the court and before the matter was STRUCK OUT   
   conveyed a stubborn unwillingness to provide an[y] resolution as to the   
   IDENTITY of the person depicted within the PHOTOGRAPHS as most probably   
   an EMPLOYEE and neither was he willing to take any opportunity after the   
   COURT to even acknowledge nor address any aspect of the written   
   complaint dated 7 JULY 2019 comprising some #464 pages which had on 22   
   AUGUST 2019 (delivered 26 AUGUST 2019) been provided to 4 participants   
   within THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD as the reasonable grounds concerning   
   the UNLAWFUL nature of the YEAR LONG LIQUOR BAN IMPOSED BY THE ACCORD ON   
   30 MAY 2017 which was not undertaken in a prescribed manner pertaining   
   to an insignificant event @ 1227 HOURS ON 26 MARCH 2017.   
      
   Of particular concern is my receiving on 5 JUNE 2017, a NOTICE OF   
   IMMEDIATE BANNING FROM WELLINGTON ACCORD LICENSED PREMISES DATED 30 MAY   
   2017 that wasn't undertaken in any lawfully prescribed manner, nor   
   predicated upon any grounds as REFUSAL OF SERVICE, nor any SUBSTANTIATED   
   FACTS but was entirely conforming to a CAUSE CÉLÈBRE IMPERATIVE   
   constituted by the ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR EVENTS IN   
   CONTRADICTION TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY:   
      
   SUNDAY 31 MAY 2015 - #364 <-- ANNIVERSARY OF DECOROUS RAINBOW SASH   
   PROTEST AGAINST CARDINAL GEORGE PELL'S PRE-MILLENNIUM REFUSAL OF   
   COMMUNION AT SAINT PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL ON BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY 1998   
   SUNDAY 29 MAY 2016 - #364   
   SUNDAY 28 MAY 2017 - #371 <-- CAUSE CÉLÈBRE TARGETED BY UNLAWFUL LIQUOR   
   BAN DATED 30 MAY 2017 AND DELIVERED 5 JUNE 2017:   
      
   NO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION OCCURRED AT THIS TIME AND ONLY   
   SUBSEQUENTLY UPON 8 JUNE 2017 COINCIDING WITH THE PLAQUE INSTALLATION AT   
   THE #1554 / #728 - MARION STATUE BEING A DEFERENTIAL ALLEGIANCE GIVEN TO   
   #491 - PATER FAMILIAS (ie. in contradistinction to such being the   
   epitome as the OFFICE of the GOVERNOR GENERAL vis a vis SECTION VIII of   
   QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT) AS MANUS PRINCIPLE OF #419 - CONTROL   
   expressed by the ROMAN family law concept of relationship based on   
   *DOMINATION* as being a RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ROME BY AN   
   ALLEGIANCE GIVEN TO A FOREIGN POWER.   
      
   On 25 JULY 2017 a FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST into the matter was   
   initiated, as there had been no response FROM THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR   
   ACCORD to written requests for further information in relation to my   
   decorous conduct on 26 MARCH 2017 as consistent with my HAUTE COUTURE   
   shirt and cuff-linked attire as an alleged infraction which did not meet   
   the criteria as an adverse impetus of mind, nor gravitas of action   
   conveying any threat beyond being a prudent observation of the patron's   
   bellicose action (AS PHOTOGRAPHS CLEARLY DEPICT), for the RESPONDENT as   
   licensee to then have any responsibilities and authority under the   
   LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM ACT 1998 (the Act) with regards to disallowing any   
   drunken, violent or quarrelsome persons to enter or remain upon their   
   licensed premises and to provide ANY and ALL such information as is   
   LAWFULLY REQUIRED in the "ISSUING OF BANNING NOTICE" and "CONTENT OF A   
   BANNING NOTICE" under the auspices of the LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM ACT 1998.   
      
   WE RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO OUR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST DATED 28   
   SEPTEMBER 2017 STATING THAT THE FALSE COMPLAINT TO POLICE (SERGEANT   
   ANDREW MILBOURNE REGN: 30944) WAS MADE BY THE STAR HOTEL @ 1754 HOURS ON   
   18 APRIL 2017: "PLEASE FIND ATTACHED THE INFORMATION REQUESTED ABOUT THE   
   INCIDENT WE DISCUSSED TODAY REGARDING THE MAN WHO MADE DEATH THREATS   
   TOWARDS PATRONS.  IF YOU NEED ANY MORE INFORMATION PELASE LET ME KNOW."   
      
   THAT THE PAST ACTION BY STAFF MEMBERS: Have dealt with the male customer   
   once prior, where  ... [CENSORED] ...  On this particular occasion, he   
   mentioned having been up since 2 AM *WORKING* *ON* *ANTI*-*TERRORISM*   
   *DOCUMENTS*, *THAT* *HE* *WAS* *A* *VERY* *IMPORTANT* *PERSON* *TO*   
   *THE* *COUNTRY* *AND* *HAD* *UNUSUAL* *SKILLS*, etc.  All of which he   
   revealed in a quick conversation before ordering.  ... [CENSORED] ...   
   After the complaint about his behaviour was made, I closed the door to   
   the glasshouse and drew the curtains to create a visual barrier of the   
   group, asked the man to go back to his new seat, which he did.  He   
   insisted that the women had been too loud but calmly waited for food."   
      
   THAT UNDER SECTION 9A(2) and (3) OF THE CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA (1958)   
   THIS STAFF MEMBER OF THE STAR HOTEL BY SUCH KNOWLEDGE OF "*WORKING* *ON*   
   *ANTI*-*TERRORISM*" IS GUILTY OF A CRIMINAL OFFENCE BECAUSE THEY FAILED   
   TO TAKE ALL REASONABLE ACTION, given that: "A person who—   
      
   (a) receives or assists another person who is to his knowledge guilty of   
   treason in order to enable him to escape punishment; or   
   (b) knowing that a person intends to commit treason, does not give   
   information thereof with all reasonable despatch to a constable or use   
   other reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence—   
      
   shall be guilty of an indictable offence."   
      
   AND THAT THE CAPRICIOUS SCENARIO ADVANCED AS CONVEYING IMPULSIVE IMPOSTS   
   WHICH IS THEIR BARBAROUS CHARACTERISTIC AS FALSELY CLAIMED IS MADE UPON   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)