XPost: aus.politics, alt.france, nl.politiek   
   XPost: de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, soc.culture.belgium   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   In conclusion as a philological response to SENATOR MEHREEN FARUQI's   
   ISLAMIC CONTEMPT OF THE SOVEREIGN is summed by the given notion (ie. by   
   ISOPSEPHY as the weighing of words) #1016 - CACODEMONIC as κακός (kakós,   
   â€œbadâ€�) + δαίμων (daímÅ   
   n, “genius, divinityâ€�) vs #1016 - POLITEUOMAI as   
   citizen / pledge to law of life.   
      
   Of course one could simply have written a poem about the circumstance of   
   life and pointed out that a mother is more likely to have their hand up   
   a turkey's butt on thanksgiving as an euphemism for piss off through   
   assiduous removal of the worthless and detestable object.   
      
   -- HEY GIBLET --   
      
   "DANG YOU SHITHOLE   
   A CAPED CRUSADER.   
   MEATHEAD PARASOL.   
   MY SPACE INVADER.   
      
   HYENAS EACH ONE.   
   ON A PICNIC TREAT.   
   CONGREGATING FUN.   
   GROWLING CONCEIT.   
      
   YOU’RE NO TROJAN.   
   JUST TURKEY ARSE.   
   A FORAGING BOGAN.   
   FEVERISH FOR FARCE."   
      
   {@13: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#414); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#459)}   
      
        #434 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR MOTHER'S DAY ON 14 MAY 2023 as [#20,   
   #300, #8, #6, #100] /   
   #414 as [#300, #8, #6, #100] = sᵉchôwq (H7814): {UMBRA: #414 % #41 = #4}   
   1) laughter, laughing stock, mocking, derision; 1a) laughter; 1a1)   
   joyful; 1a2) hollow; 1b) derision (of object); 1c) sport;   
      
   #459 as [#5, #50, #4, #70, #60, #70, #200] = éndoxos (G1741): {UMBRA:   
   #459 % #41 = #8} 1) held in good or in great esteem, of high repute; 1a)   
   illustrious, honourable, esteemed; 1b) notable, glorious; 1c) splendid;   
   1c1) of clothing; 1c2) fig., free from sins;   
      
   ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #356 as [#10, #40, #6, #300] / [#10, #40, #300,   
   #6] = mûwsh (H4185): {UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18} 1) to depart, remove; 1a)   
   (Qal); 1a1) to depart; 1a2) to remove; 1a3) to be removed (of inanimate   
   objects); 1b) (Hiphil) to remove, depart;   
      
   DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #654 as [#200, #20, #400, #2, #1, #30, #1] =   
   skýbalon (G4657): {UMBRA: #773 % #41 = #35} 1) any refuse, as the   
   excrement of animals, offscourings, rubbish, dregs; 1a) of things   
   worthless and detestable;   
      
   #654 as [#40, #8, #300, #5, #100, #1, #200] = mḗtÄ“r (G3384): {UMBRA:   
   #456 % #41 = #5} 1) a *MOTHER*; 2) metaph. the source of something, the   
   motherland;   
      
   That SENATOR PAULINE HANSON could have said, "PISS OFF BACK TO THAT   
   SH@THOLE" as then a nefarious design being an equivalent to the   
   motherland statement "PISS OFF BACK TO PAKISTAN" and which cannot be   
   considered defamatory given it implies a factual reality.   
      
   Is it then reasonable to ask the superficial question whether adherents   
   to Islam are incapable of any #1016 - POLITEUOMAI as citizen / pledge to   
   law of life because on the basis of belief (ie. to not hold such belief   
   is to discredit the prophet and be a blasphemy which would be diabolical   
   as life threatening) given that the religion as claim to #71 - DOMINION   
   has the potential to impose a duty of #398 = kÄ“nsos (G2778) *TRIBUTE*   
   towards themselves, they do not as a religion then pay taxes within   
   countries where they are subject #1016 = politeúomai (G4176): *CITIZENS*   
   who have *PLEDGED* *TO* *SOME* *LAW* *OF* *LIFE*?   
      
   Implicitly as this test applied to their own belief the concept of #1016   
   = politeúomai (G4176): *CITIZEN* within a non-Islamic country being a   
   pledged criteria of life is not applicable to them as Muslims.   
      
   As we have variously stated, the comparator as christological question   
   "IS IT LAWFUL TO GIVE #398 - *TRIBUTE*-G2778: TO CAESAR, OR NOT?" [Mark   
   12:14] then brings to mind the consideration of whether it is directed   
   towards the state or to an unseen licentious persona within some place   
   and time (ie. "MASTER, WE KNOW THAT THOU ART TRUE, AND CAREST FOR NO MAN   
   FOR THOU *REGARDEST*-G991: {in a geographical sense of places,   
   mountains, buildings, etc. turning towards any quarter, as it were,   
   facing it} NOT THE PERSON OF MEN, BUT TEACHEST THE WAY OF GOD IN TRUTH").   
      
   Such conundrum of disparate attitudes towards citizenship is further   
   exasperated by the notion that our COMMONWEALTH being the product of   
   CAESAROPAPISM which is the idea of combining the social and political   
   power of secular government with religious power, or of making secular   
   authority superior to the spiritual authority of the Church; especially   
   concerning the connection of the Church with government.   
      
   In an extreme form, CAESAROPAPISM is where the head of state, notably   
   the emperor ("Caesar", by extension a "superior" king), is also the   
   supreme head of the church.   
      
   SIMPLY PUT KING CHARLES III IS HEAD OF THE PROTESTANT CHURCH AND HAS   
   SWORN BY OATH TO BE DEFENDER OF THE FAITH WHICH THEN SUPPORTS ALL OTHER   
   FAITHS.   
      
   To my mind, this implies a TERNARY NUMBER SUPERORDINATE STATE of being   
   which then supports the MACHINERY OF THE SECULAR STATE OR SECTARIANISM   
   AS BIPARTITE NUMBER PARADIGMS / MULTIVERSE...   
      
   The immediate concern is that any SUPERORDINATE TERNARY CONSTRUCT   
   (CAESAROPAPISM) --> BIPARTITE MACHINERY OF STATE is distinct to   
   instances of SECTARIANISM AS BIPARTITE NUMBER when ENTΙRΕLY a construct   
   deploying a #232 - NOBLE LIE (ie. being a mechanism that is shown to be   
   seditious towards the sovereign / autonomy dynamic: Saudi Kaaba secreted   
   meteor and slaughter of a journalist as unresolved problem) against the   
   TERNARY NUMBER PARADIGM upon which the SUPERORDINATE STATE as   
   CAESAROPAPISM exists:   
      
   a) THEY ARE POINTING IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS--NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET;   
      
   b) ANY OATH IS TO THE BIPARTITE NUMBER REALM and not the SUPERORDINATE   
   TERNARY CONSTRUCT -- IT CANNOT BE TRUE AS A VERITY;   
      
   c) SUCH OATH IS ONLY A PERFIDIOUS LIP AND IMPLICITLY TREASONOUS   
      
   The question is why these medieval crusaders (ie. resembling or likened   
   to the Middle Ages, especially in being cruel, uncivilized, or primitive   
   as a propensity for non-sapient action such as #181 = orgḗ (G3709):   
   *AGITATION* *OF* *THE* *SOUL*, *IMPULSE*, *DESIRE*, *ANY* *VIOLENT*   
   *EMOTION*;  #234  / #384 -  ágrios (G66): *OF* *MEN* *AND* *ANIMALS*   
   *IN* *A* *MORAL* *SENSE*, *WILD* *SAVAGE*, *FIERCE*) who claim thereby a   
   piety anchored upon ritual, but have no will of compliance to such GOD   
   ordained majesty as the ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY and FACILITATORS /   
   ARBITRATORS OF FREEWILL being first principles to the FEDERATION AS   
   COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA?   
      
   It is lamentable such that BIPARTITE MACHINERY OF SECTARIANISM by a   
   pursuit of #164 - DOMINION (#65 + #41 + #17 as BIPARTITE NUMBER: #844 -   
   Î¼ÎµÏ„ακίνησις (metakínÄ“sis)) as the seminal cause for breaches of   
   #68 -   
   *RIGHTS* by an #11 - *INSTITUTIONAL* *IMPERATIVE* does not see any need   
   resolve the #44 - *HITLER* *QUESTION* (ie. 90 years and counting) and   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)