XPost: aus.politics, alt.france, nl.politiek   
   XPost: de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, soc.culture.belgium   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   In conclusion as a philological response to SENATOR MEHREEN FARUQI's   
   ISLAMIC CONTEMPT OF THE SOVEREIGN is summed by the given notion (ie. by   
   ISOPSEPHY as weighing words) #1016 - CACODEMONIC as κακός (kakós,   
   â€œbadâ€�) +   
   Î´Î±Î¯Î¼Ï‰Î½ (daímÅ   
   n, “genius, divinityâ€�) vs #1016 - POLITEUOMAI as citizen /   
   pledge to law of life.   
      
   Of course one could simply have written a poem about the circumstance of   
   life and pointed out that a mother is more likely to have their hand up a   
   turkey's butt on thanksgiving as an euphemism for piss off through   
   assiduous removal of the worthless and detestable object.   
      
   -- HEY GIBLET --   
      
   "DANG YOU SHITHOLE   
   A CAPED CRUSADER.   
   MEATHEAD PARASOL.   
   MY SPACE INVADER.   
      
   HYENAS EACH ONE.   
   ON A PICNIC TREAT.   
   CONGREGATING FUN.   
   GROWLING CONCEIT.   
      
   YOU’RE NO TROJAN.   
   JUST TURKEY ARSE.   
   A FORAGING BOGAN.   
   FEVERISH FOR FARCE."   
      
   {@13: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#414); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#459)}   
      
       #434 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR MOTHER'S DAY ON 14 MAY 2023 as [#20,   
   #300, #8, #6, #100] /   
   #414 as [#300, #8, #6, #100] = sᵉchôwq (H7814): {UMBRA: #414 % #41 = #4} 1)   
   laughter, laughing stock, mocking, derision; 1a) laughter; 1a1) joyful;   
   1a2) hollow; 1b) derision (of object); 1c) sport;   
      
   #459 as [#5, #50, #4, #70, #60, #70, #200] = éndoxos (G1741): {UMBRA: #459   
   % #41 = #8} 1) held in good or in great esteem, of high repute; 1a)   
   illustrious, honourable, esteemed; 1b) notable, glorious; 1c) splendid;   
   1c1) of clothing; 1c2) fig., free from sins;   
      
   ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #356 as [#10, #40, #6, #300] / [#10, #40, #300, #6] =   
   mûwsh (H4185): {UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18} 1) to depart, remove; 1a) (Qal);   
   1a1) to depart; 1a2) to remove; 1a3) to be removed (of inanimate objects);   
   1b) (Hiphil) to remove, depart;   
      
   DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #654 as [#200, #20, #400, #2, #1, #30, #1] = skýbalon   
   (G4657): {UMBRA: #773 % #41 = #35} 1) any refuse, as the excrement of   
   animals, offscourings, rubbish, dregs; 1a) of things worthless and   
   detestable;   
      
   #654 as [#40, #8, #300, #5, #100, #1, #200] = mḗtÄ“r (G3384): {UMBRA: #456 %   
   #41 = #5} 1) a *MOTHER*; 2) metaph. the source of something, the   
   motherland;   
      
   That SENATOR PAULINE HANSON could then say, "PISS OFF BACK TO THAT   
   SH@THOLE" as then a nefarious design being equivalent to the motherland   
   statement "PISS OFF BACK TO PAKISTAN" and which cannot be considered   
   defamatory given it implies a factual reality.   
      
   Is it then reasonable to ask the superficial question whether Islam is   
   incapable of any #1016 - POLITEUOMAI as citizen / pledge to law of life   
   because on the basis of belief (ie. to not hold such belief is to discredit   
   the prophet and be a blasphemy which would be diabolical as life   
   threatening) given that the religion as claim to #71 - DOMINION had the   
   potential to impose  a duty of #398 = kÄ“nsos (G2778) *TRIBUTE* towards   
   themselves, so why do they as a religion not then pay taxes within   
   countries where they are subject #1016 = politeúomai (G4176): *CITIZENS*   
   who have *PLEDGED* *TO* *SOME* *LAW* *OF* *LIFE*?   
      
   As we have variously stated, the comparator as christological question "IS   
   IT LAWFUL TO GIVE #398 - *TRIBUTE*-G2778: TO CAESAR, OR NOT?" [Mark 12:14]   
   then brings to mind the consideration of whether it's directed towards the   
   state or to an unseen licentious persona within some place and time (ie.   
   "MASTER, WE KNOW THAT THOU ART TRUE, AND CAREST FOR NO MAN FOR THOU   
   *REGARDEST*-G991: {in a geographical sense of places, mountains, buildings,   
   etc. turning towards any quarter, as it were, facing it} NOT THE PERSON OF   
   MEN, BUT TEACHEST THE WAY OF GOD IN TRUTH").   
      
   Such impossibility is further exasperated by the notion that our   
   COMMONWEALTH is the product of CAESAROPAPISM which is the idea of combining   
   the social and political power of secular government with religious power,   
   or of making secular authority superior to the spiritual authority of the   
   Church; especially concerning the connection of the Church with government.   
   In an extreme form, CAESAROPAPISM is where the head of state, notably the   
   emperor ("Caesar", by extension a "superior" king), is also the supreme   
   head of the church.   
      
   SIMPLY PUT KING CHARLES III IS HEAD OF THE PROTESTANT CHURCH AND DEFENDER   
   OF THE FAITH WHICH THEN SUPPORTS ALL OTHER FAITHS.   
      
   To my mind, this implies a TERNARY NUMBER SUPERORDINATE STATE which then   
   supports the MACHINERY OF THE SECULAR STATE OR SECTARIANISM AS BIPARTITE   
   NUMBER PARADIGMS / MULTIVERSE...   
      
   The immediate concern is that any SUPERORDINATE TERNARY CONSTRUCT   
   (CAESAROPAPISM) --> BIPARTITE MACHINERY OF STATE is distinct to   
   SECTARIANISM AS BIPARTITE NUMBER when ENTΙRΕLY a construct deploying a #232   
   - NOBLE LIE (ie. being a mechanism that is shown to be seditious towards   
   the sovereign / autonomy dynamic: Saudi Kaaba meteor and slaughter of   
   journalist unresolved problem) against the TERNARY NUMBER PARADIGM upon   
   which the SUPERORDINATE STATE as CAESAROPAPISM exists:   
      
   a) THEY ARE POINTING IN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS--NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET;   
      
   b) ANY OATH IS TO THE BIPARTITE NUMBER REALM and not the SUPERORDINATE   
   TERNARY CONSTRUCT -- IT CANNOT BE TRUE AS VERITY;   
      
   c) SUCH OATH IS ONLY A PERFIDIOUS LIP AND IMPLICITLY TREASONOUS   
      
      
      
   dolf  wrote:   
   > There has been months of political unrest within PAKISTAN as unequivocal   
   > evidence of partisanship (ie. without considering or judging the matter   
   > very carefully strongly supporting a person, principle, or political   
   > party) as factionalism (ie. a situation in which a group forms within a   
   > larger group, especially one with slightly different ideas from the main   
   > secular or sectarian ideological group) engaged within a diabolical   
   > struggle (ie. devil, *HELLISH*, infernal, evil, wicked, ungodly, unholy,   
   > terrible, frightful, disgraceful, shameful, lamentable, deplorable,   
   > appalling, atrocious; inferior, substandard, mediocre, unsatisfactory,   
   > inadequate, second-rate, third-rate, shoddy) over domination [#164 -   
   > DOMINION (#65 + #41 + #17) v's (#72 + #34 + #17)] of the state (ie. @1 =   
   > #296, @5 = #328 IMMATERIAL ELEMENTS) machinery by a single group, cult   
   > of personality or coalition of elites.   
   >   
   > Following IMRAN KHAN's arrest on 9 MAY 2023, some eight people have died   
   > and hundreds have been arrested as protests pitting his supporters   
   > against army supporters turned violent.   
   >   
   > We would therefore respectfully ask SENATOR MEHREEN FARUQI which of the   
   > following statements most reasonably appeals to her sensibility:   
   >   
   > -- GO TO HELL?   
   > -- GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM?   
   > -- PISS OFF BACK TO PAKISTAN?   
   >   
   > #311 as [#20, #1, #20, #70, #200] = kakós (G2556): {UMBRA: #311 % #41 =   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)