From: rking164@comcast.net   
      
   On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 11:26:11 AM UTC-5, Lazarus Cain wrote:   
   > Old man Biden just doesn't have it when it comes to making the best   
   decisions concerning world energy and global warming.    
   > It is questionable whether the US is world leader in nuclear technology   
   which some believe to be the future road to "green energy" production.   
   Certainly other nations do refer to China if they wish to construct a nuclear   
   power plant.    
   > With regard to fusion, the US is in a very tight race if it wishes to be the   
   leader in the production of power from fusion energy.    
   > The problem with China is the usage of a breeder technology which would have   
   a difficult time facing implementation in the US. This doesn't prevent secret   
   US military fusion projects, but what we are discussing is wide scale peaceful   
   and safe usage of    
   fusion power.    
   > We can easily envision very modern and secure controls provided for any   
   future plants from advancements in electronics, material science and   
   artificial intelligence using high speed computational power. China is in a   
   good position to develop these    
   technologies while US may ned to struggle in an attempt to catch up or keep up   
   pace.    
   > Biden is a politician lacking scientific aptitude, neither is he a   
   mathematician. He is a good leader for a losing team, or is the type of leader   
   who can turn a winning team into a losing team.    
   > Were it not for his refusal to allow Russia to have its gas pipeline to   
   bypass Ukraine, we doubt that Russia would have ventured into this conflict   
   with Ukraine. We discover that it is the Russian claim to Crimea which   
   inspired Biden to disallow the    
   pipeline the way he did. All these events are obscured by today's   
   distractions, but it is relevant to keep in mind the causes. Certainly these   
   plans existed but Trump and Putin would never agree to such an attack.    
   > So is Trump on trial for discussing such secret plans.? Well, the S public   
   will never find out because they are so secret. Besides, since they are   
   secret, they might be referring to something completely different. Either way,   
   would the US ever be    
   justified in attacking Iran's nuclear power plant? If I were a US   
   ex-President, maybe I would mock such a plan as well in front of friends in   
   spite of the secrecy.    
   > Should we keep in mind any possible secret plans by the US to attack the   
   Iranian nuclear power plant. Bear in mind, the US still has plans to destroy   
   Iran's nuclear power plant, but they are secret.    
   > Israel also would like to target Iran's nuclear power plant.    
   > Do you see where I am going?    
   > In order to fight global warming, we need global cooperation, not global   
   Cold War.    
   > If nothing else, the legacy of Joe Biden will be his reignition of the Cold   
   War and setting back diplomatic relations a least 30 years.    
   > If it were not for Ukraine, I believe he would certainly have been reelected   
   next year, but because of his involvement concerning Ukraine, Trump will   
   probably be reelected in spite of all the legal issues,    
   > Biden wishes to promote conflict with China rather than buying the   
   semiconductors at a fair price. The idiot believes the US can produce   
   semiconductors more efficiently. Why not simply cooperate with China and allow   
   the market to do its thing without    
   US trying to control everything?    
   > Biden is the old way of thinking.    
   > Trump may brag USA as number one, but he also has some business savvy to   
   boast larger than life proposals and get away with managing to achieve them,   
   even if by hook or by crook. Compare his competence with Biden's apparent   
   incompetence.    
   > Biden is betting on US success with regard to conflict with Russia and   
   China.    
   > Trump will deal with China and Russia as a businessman, making deals.    
   > A very important deal would be cooperation with China with regard to solar   
   and nuclear energy. The technologies are quite related as they both deal with   
   radiated energy which is not really taught well in US high schools, so the   
   general public is in the    
   dark with regard to understanding how the science of each works.    
   > Now, a successful fusion power plant would be regarded by the US as a   
   potential military weapon. Scale one down small enough to make a submarine or   
   a navy ship. There you go. So simply doesn't want the successful development   
   of a properly operating    
   fusion power plant! Imagine that. Just consider what the US would do. So , it   
   s all shrouded in secrecy and we have a new Tower of Babel, being incapable of   
   reachng the heavens because of mutual mistrust and hatred instead of global   
   cooperation. That is    
   our lesson here.   
   Did Iran Suffer a Nuclear Setback?   
      
   July 13, 2020 9:00 am    
      
   What happened at the Natanz nuclear plant earlier this month?   
      
   It appears that a huge explosion occurred at the plant, specifically at a   
   warehouse used to construct advanced centrifuges. Iran had hoped to roll out a   
   large number of such machines to boost its uranium enrichment capacity. The   
   U.S. press has speculated    
   that Israel was responsible. In the past few months, there have been various   
   accidents at Iran’s military facilities, including at a missile production   
   factory.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)