Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.russian    |    More than just vodka and shirtless Putin    |    98,335 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,910 of 98,335    |
|    Lazarus Cain to All    |
|    Was Hamas the government of a sovereign     |
|    20 Nov 23 06:48:29    |
      From: rking164@comcast.net              An unlawful combatant, illegal combatant or unprivileged combatant/belligerent       is a person who directly engages in armed conflict in violation of the laws of       war and therefore is claimed not to be protected by the Geneva Conventions.       The International        Committee of the Red Cross points out that the terms "unlawful combatant",       "illegal combatant" or "unprivileged combatant/belligerent" are not defined in       any international agreements. While the concept of an unlawful combatant is       included in the Third        Geneva Convention, the phrase itself does not appear in the document. Article       4 of the Third Geneva Convention does describe categories under which a person       may be entitled to prisoner of war status. There are other international       treaties that deny        lawful combatant status for mercenaries and children.                     The Geneva Conventions apply in wars between two or more opposing sovereign       states. They do not recognize any status of lawfulness for combatants in       conflicts not involving two or more nation-states, such as during civil wars       between state forces (       territorial or third state) and non-state armed groups. A state in such a       conflict is legally bound only to observe Common Article 3 of the Geneva       Conventions. All parties are otherwise completely free to either apply or not       apply any of the remaining        Articles of the Conventions. Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention states       that the status of detainees whose combatant status is in doubt should be       determined by a "competent tribunal". Until such time, they must be treated as       prisoners of war. After        a "competent tribunal" has determined that an individual is not a lawful       combatant, the "detaining power" may choose to accord the individual the       rights and privileges of a prisoner of war as described in the Third Geneva       Convention, but is not required        to do so. An individual who is not a lawful combatant, who is not a national       of a neutral state living in the belligerent territory, and who is not a       national of a co-belligerent state, retains rights and privileges under the       Fourth Geneva Convention and        must be "treated with humanity and, in case of trial, shall not be deprived of       the rights of fair and regular trial".              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca