XPost: alt.france, nl.politiek, uk.legal   
   XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   EXCERPT DIARY NOTES USING #237 - USE OF FORCE (ACQUIRED FROM INTERACTION   
   WITH POLICE ON 25 APRIL 2006 AS OUTRAGE TO GOVERNMENT FAWNING OVER   
   SOLDIER'S DELIBERATE DEATH DUE TO SELF INFLECTED GUNSHOT ON QUEENS   
   BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006) META DESCRIPTOR 24 STRATA  DIALECTIC AS   
   TRANSCENDENT (ie. SOME ARE OUTSIDE TIME AND NOT EASY TO ACCESS) OF   
   DISCUSSION (ie. the NOTION OF MARRIAGE is either a #87 - INALIENABLE   
   RIGHT TRINOMIAL PRINCIPLE or a BINOMIAL #34 - qÄ«n (親): CONCORD / #115 =   
   [#33, #34, #48] within KINGDOM OF ENDS ) WITH INSURER'S MEDICAL   
   SPECIALIST @ 1500 hours Wednesday 4 April 2007   
      
   PAGE 36 / 58 - ITEM #17 - (E: #353, S: #293), Plane: 6, Tao: #28 -   
   Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to Simplicity, I-Ching: H24 -   
   Turning Point, Mystery: #2 - Full Circle   
      
   In my correspondence of 6 March 2007, I conveyed that AXA made an   
   application to Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal for an   
   extra-ordinary hearing in 7 December 2001 which resulted in an order to   
   be made against me. During the hearing of the matter, the AXA   
   representative claimed that I had made threatening telephone calls to   
   AXA. This was absolutely untrue and misled the Tribunal. The telephone   
   calls were not threatening at all. They simply contained information on   
   my “September 2001 – Year #4 of #19 vMeme/Moment Calendar Overlayâ€�, in   
   relation to my voluntary involvement as ‘religious and political belief   
   and activity’ associated to the suppression of terrorism.   
      
   The conclusion {Formula of Autonomy}, which contains the verdict   
   (sentence), what is laid down as right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as   
   122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September   
   2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762. (ie. temporality #400 (x 365.2423   
   [7 x 24 x 13 x 49 / 293 years or 6J as 294 x 364 days] = 146,097 days) %   
   22 = 17 SEPTEMBER / #6000 years % 22 = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001)   
      
   #353 = [#3, #10, #11, #32, #36, #48, #68, #71, #74]   
      
   zhé (折): 1. to fold, 2. a discount; a rebate, 3. to break; to snap, 4.   
   to suffer a loss, 5. a book; a folder, 6. name for horizontal hooked   
   stroke, 7. to twist; to bend, 8. a section of a Yuan dynasty poetic   
   drama, 9. to be convinced; to decide, 10. to convert into; to exchange;   
   to barter, 11. to turn over; to roll over; to overthrow, 12. to pour   
   liquid out, 13. to break; to snap, 14. to loose money, 15. She, 16. to   
   reduce; to deduct, 17. to analyze; to compute a proportion, 18. to   
   crush, 19. to die early; to die unexpectedly, 20. to censure; to   
   criticize, 21. a kind of medical treatment, 22. a sacrificial mound   
      
   #293 = [#26, #61, #66, #69, #71]   
      
   yì (亦): 1. also; too, 2. but, 3. this; he; she, 4. although; even   
   though, 5. already, 6. particle with no meaning, 7. Yi   
      
   PAGE 56 / 58 - ITEM #23 - (E: #400, S: #331), Plane: 1, Tao: #49 -   
   Sage's Constancy / Trust in Virtue, I-Ching: H3 - Initial Difficulties,   
   Mystery: #4 – Barrier   
      
   Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of my   
   claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination and   
   assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to arrange   
   as further appointments, however, there is a requirement expressed by   
   paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22   
   September 2006 correspondences, that “any further written and signed   
   requests for medical attendances from the Insurer ought to grant   
   sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a statement on   
   individual or organizational views of *Marriage* is] to be undertaken   
   and is contingent upon attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.â€�   
      
   I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative   
   rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner   
   fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or   
   organizational views of *Marriage* , to refuse attendance and that   
   consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment of   
   benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination and   
   assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt of   
   their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.   
      
   That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of   
   providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide   
   â€œa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of   
   *Marriage*â€�.  And it has no intention of providing clarification on the   
   specific usage of ‘Unusual Terms’ such as ‘AIDS’ within the contract,   
   and whether the Insurer’s usage of these terms conforms with the common   
   understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-day usage.   
      
   PAGE 58 / 58 - #24 - (E: #288, S: #340), Plane: 5, Tao: #77 - Natural   
   Guide/  Heaven's Reason, I-Ching: H12 – Stagnation, Mystery: #57 –   
   Guardedness   
      
   As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I   
   sought your considerations with regards to my administrative requirement   
   as a statement on your individual or the Insurer’s organisational views   
   of *marriage*, that is to be undertaken and is contingent upon my   
   attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.   
      
   ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?   
      
   ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURER’S STATEMENTS MADE UNDER   
   OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: “It is the manner in which I   
   reasonably interpreted those phone messages … I was threatened by Mr.   
   Boek, who by his conduct today and in the past, on any object view   
   appears to be unstableâ€� [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA Group   
   Insurance 7 December 2001]   
      
   DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE SALARY   
   CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY LODGED WITH   
   THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?   
      
      
   On 11/29/25 19:05, dolf wrote:   
   > The 2nd Vatican council was a Eucharist coverup for a lack of TDNT clarity   
   > over the course of nature as the sceptre / GLOBUS crucifer of Roman State   
   > authority and Nazism.   
   >   
   > #62 - ð�   
   ƒç–‘ = #236 / #398 / #513   
   > COGITO: #174 = [#35, #48, #25, #33, #33] as #62 - DOUBT (YI)   
   > RANGE: noon 22 to 26 SEPTEMBER   
   >   
   >>> ---- #33 ----   
   >>>   
   >>> #61 #54 #59   
   >>> #56 #58 #60   
   >>> #57 #62 #55   
   >   
   > Whereas the 1st Vatican council was convoked by Pope Pius IX on 29 June   
   > 1868, under the rising threat of the Kingdom of Italy encroaching on the   
   > Papal States. It opened on 8 December 1869 and was adjourned on 20   
   > September 1870 after the Italian Capture of Rome. Its best-known decision   
   > is its definition of papal infallibility.   
   >   
   > dolf  wrote:   
   >> CORRECTION:   
   >>   
   >> The historical comparator of birthright entitlement (#1751 prÅ   
   totókia)   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)