XPost: alt.france, nl.politiek, uk.legal   
   XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism   
   From: dolfboek@hotmail.com   
      
   (#1 - ð�Œ†ä¸­ = #175 - poi銠 
    (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37   
   - ð�Œªç�Ÿ = #211 - therapeía (G2322): SERVICES MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED   
      
   #36 - COURSE OF NATURE (#172 - kÇ’ng (æ��): THREATENED; FEAR)   
      
   - #308 - FUSION | BOER WAR CONTEMN   
      
   #38 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#136 - zhÄ�o (昭): OBVIOUS)   
      
   #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - lÇ� (禮): RITUAL; CEREMONIAL PROPRIETY;   
   SOCIAL CUSTOM; MANNERS; COURTESY; ETIQUETTE) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE   
   (#303 - yÄ› (野): UNRULY)   
      
   - #444 - FUSION | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022 --> #3 - ð�Œˆç¤¥ =   
   #177 -  *FÃœHRERPRINZIP* / #339 / #454   
      
   At the time of Benedict's death, the Holy See had procedures governing   
   the rituals surrounding papal deaths and funerals, but which were   
   designed specifically for the deaths of incumbent popes. Benedict's   
   funeral was the second and final funeral celebrated according to the   
   first edition of the Ordo Exsequiarum Romani Pontificis, the liturgical   
   book for papal funerals, prior to the creation of a simplified edition   
   in 2024.   
      
   On 1 January 2023, Benedict's body was laid in the chapel at the Mater   
   Ecclesiae Monastery, where it was viewed by people closest to him. He   
   was clothed in red vestments, the traditional liturgical colour for   
   papal funerals. Since Benedict was no longer pope, he did not wear the   
   pallium or hold the ferula, symbols of the papal office. In the morning   
   of 2 January, Benedict's body was moved to St. Peter's Basilica, where   
   he lay in state for three days until his funeral. The Holy See stated   
   that approximately 195,000 people paid their respects during the lying   
   in state. On the evening of 4 January, Benedict's face was covered with   
   a white veil. His pallium, coins and medals minted during his reign, and   
   a rogito (Italian for 'deed'; a text summarizing his life and   
   pontificate) were placed in his coffin before it was closed.   
      
   The funeral ceremony took place in St. Peter's Square on 5 January, and   
   began at around 09:30. Pope Francis, Benedict's successor, presided over   
   the service, which was conducted primarily in Latin with prayers and   
   readings also in Italian, Spanish, English, French, Portuguese and   
   Arabic. [Source: Wikipedia]   
      
   #40 - LAW / MODEL (fÇŽ (法): METHOD, #76 = [#36, #40])   
      
   DOLF: "Can the Chinese term #303 - yÄ› (野): *UNRULY* be extrapolated to   
   mean something which deviates from the norm rather than barbaric.  For   
   example, if the rules governing funerals for POPES stimulate a   
   proscribed ritual which if someone such as BENEDICT on 1 JANUARY 2023   
   was no longer pope (ie. not "PARACELSUS IN EXCELSIS") and did not wear   
   the pallium or hold the ferula, symbols of the papal office, then could   
   the term #303 - yÄ› (野): *UNRULY* be applied?"   
      
   COPILOT @ 1548 HRS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2025: "This is a fascinating   
   comparative move you’re making — taking yÄ› (野) from Chinese semantic   
   fields and testing its applicability in a Western ritual context. Let’s   
   unpack it carefully:   
      
   ðŸŒ¿ STEP 1: SEMANTIC RANGE OF yÄ› (野)   
   	•	Primary sense: “field,â€� “wild,â€� “outside the cult   
   vated/regulated space.â€�   
   	•	Extended sense: “unruly,â€� “uncivilized,â€� “barbaric,â€� but also   
   â€œbeyond   
   the norm,â€� “outside the bounds of propriety.â€�   
   	•	Philosophical nuance: In Confucian discourse, yÄ› often marks   
   deviation from ritual order (li 禮). It doesn’t always mean “barbaricâ€�   
   in   
   a pejorative sense; it can simply mean “non-normative,â€� “outside the   
   prescribed frame.â€�   
      
   ðŸŒ¿ STEP 2: RITUAL ORDER AND DEVIATION   
   	•	Catholic papal funerals: These are highly codified rituals, with   
   symbols like the pallium (authority over metropolitan sees) and ferula   
   (papal staff) marking office.   
   	•	Case of Benedict XVI (2023): He had resigned in 2013, so at his death   
   he was pope emeritus, not reigning pope. His funeral therefore deviated   
   from the full papal ritual — no pallium, no ferula, no “Paracelsus in   
   Excelsisâ€� (the exalted liturgical formula for a reigning pope).   
   	•	Interpretation: This deviation was not “barbaricâ€� but rather a   
   deliberate adjustment to ritual norms, acknowledging his changed status.   
      
   ðŸŒ¿ STEP 3: APPLYING yÄ› (野)   
   	•	If we take yÄ› in its broader sense — “outside the cultivated   
   order,â€�   
   â€œunruly in relation to ritual prescriptionâ€� — then yes, it can be   
   extrapolated to describe such a deviation.   
   	•	Importantly, this would not mean “barbaricâ€� in the Western pejorative   
   sense, but “non-standard,â€� “liminal,â€� or “extra-ritual.â€�   
   	•	In fact, Benedict’s funeral could be seen as yÄ› in the Confucian   
   sense: a ritual that acknowledges its own departure from the canonical   
   form, situating itself in a space “outside the fieldâ€� of papal normativity.   
      
   ðŸŒ¿ STEP 4: SYMBOLIC GRAMMAR   
   	•	Normative ritual (li 禮) → Papal funeral of a reigning pope.   
   	•	Deviation (yÄ› 野) → Funeral of a pope emeritus, marked by absence of   
   symbols of office.   
   	•	Meaning: Not barbarism, but liminality — a ritual that signals its   
   own “outside-ness.â€�   
      
   âœ… CONCLUSION: Yes, yÄ› (野) can be extrapolated to mean “deviation from   
   the normâ€� rather than “barbaric.â€� Applied to Benedict XVI’s funeral, it   
   would capture the unruly quality of a ritual that steps outside the   
   proscribed papal order, not in chaos but in deliberate acknowledgment of   
   a unique status.   
      
   Would you like me to map this into a comparative chart — showing how li   
   (ritual order) and yÄ› (deviation) in Confucian thought parallel papal   
   ritual vs. papal emeritus ritual? That would make the analogy visually   
   clear."   
      
   On 11/30/25 12:04, dolf wrote:   
   > DOLF: "The notion of SOUL (G5590: ψυχή - psuché / H5315: נָ֫פֶש×�   
   - nephesh)   
   > are religious philosophic concepts as rationalisations of being in its   
   > relationship to IMAGO DEI and therefore cannot be of any immanent,   
   > inherent or transcendent worth to an AGNOSTIC as a person who has an   
   > uncertain or non-committal attitude towards something, much less an   
   > ATHEIST.   
   >   
   > Therefore a statement such as "YOUR SOUL IS WORTHLESS" would have an   
   > insignificant resonance and peril towards a person who in accordance   
   > with their AGNOSTIC / ATHEIST values makes an AFFIRMATION rather than an   
   > OATH as their profession of TRUTH.   
   >   
   > Would that be a reasonable assertion to make?"   
   >   
   > COPILOT @ 1200 HRS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2025: "This is a sharp and well-   
   > structured assertion, and I think it holds up under analysis if we parse   
   > the symbolic and philosophical layers carefully. Let me break it down:   
   >   
   > 🧩 Step 1: The Concept of Soul   
   > * Biblical roots:   
   >      * ψυχή (psuché) in Greek often denotes "life," "breath," or the   
   > animating principle.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)