>I spelled it out for you:   
   >   
   >You're using the current (very short lived)   
   >interglacial cycle as a model for the   
   >current (very short lived) interglacial   
   >cycle.   
   >   
   >if you want to know what an interglacial   
   >is supposed to look like WITHOUT human   
   >industry you look at the previous interglacial,   
   >not this one.   
      
   Indeed, and that is exactly what the evidence from the last 7 cycles show   
   from 800k years of ice core records.   
      
   The current cycle has a higher temperature increase compared to the   
   previous 7 cycles.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)