Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.history.ancient    |    Ancient history (up to AD 700)    |    57,854 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 56,053 of 57,854    |
|    SolomonW to Martin Edwards    |
|    Re: Reasons why Rome fell    |
|    16 Oct 18 21:19:46    |
      From: SolomonW@citi.com              On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:53:21 +0100, Martin Edwards wrote:              > On 10/15/2018 6:13 PM, ggggg9271@gmail.com wrote:       >> On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 5:06:25 AM UTC-10, reader wrote:       >>>> In all honestly, as far as I can tell the only thing       >>>> stopping the Industrial Revolution from happen in ancient       >>>> Roman times, instead of the 18th century, was the Roman       >>>> elite.       >>>       >>> Simple, all of the prerequisite technology elements of the industrial       >>> revolution were not in place.       >>>       >>> China was the leader in technology until about the 17th century. If it       >>> were to have happened anywhere else it would b china.       >>>       >>> A 1st century roman in egypt described a rudimentary steam engine, which we       >>> associate with the industrial revolution as a primary energy conversion       >>> prerequisite.       >>       >> I thought that technological progress doesn't occur when there is a lot of       cheap labor.       >>       >> In the the case of ancient Rome, wasn't that about slaves?       >>       >> And in the case of China up to the 17th c., didn't it experience a       population boom after that?       >>       > Hero of Alexandria made steam driven automata and theatre curtains, but,       > as you say, there were slaves, so the technology was not pursued any       > further.              Reader's points are valid; the early uses of coal engines were in textiles,       something that Roman engineering had not yet developed the technology to       mechanize.              Nor did Rome have gunpowder to help mine coal, would that powered Hero of       Alexandria's machine was very expensive in Rome. Coal as the technology was       not there.              Roman mechanical engineering was not as good as European in the 1700s.              Furthermore, slaves were not cheap in the later Rome era, and they were       scarce, which probably accounts for why we see watermills starting up then.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca