Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.history.ancient    |    Ancient history (up to AD 700)    |    57,854 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 56,073 of 57,854    |
|    reader to All    |
|    Re: "Why no Industrial Revolution in Chi    |
|    19 Oct 18 18:13:09    |
      > reader wrote:       >       >> It has been observed that social organization and ideology change when       >> technology changes.       >       >What you didn't "Observe" -- you lack of reading       >comprehension -- was the fact that Roman had       >the technology to power machinery & fuel an       >industrial revolution. It never happened.              They had at most water wheels for grinding. This was an established       technology in pre-roman cultures from about 400 BC. >              Another observation cross culturally is that as the amount of energy       capture via new technology increases; the complexity of the culture       increases.              The romans like every other culture of the time used primarily animal/human       based technology for energy conversion. The romans had nothing inherent in       their material culture that made the industrial revolution potential any       greater then the other cultures of its time.              >> At any given time the ideology is sufficient to rationalize what is       >> happening. It is the tail of the dog; not the dog.       >       >Your standard idiocy.       >       >It didn't happen in most of the world. They needed       >western industrialization transplanted to their       >cultures. They never developed it themselves.              It happenned for the most part in the small n.w. corner ofeurope. The       other parts of europe andd n. america were also on the recieving end like       the rest of the world.              It involved the new energy capture technology based on coal fired steam       driven machines. Steam engines were first used to pump water from coal       mines.              That steam power technology produced vastly more energy then did water or       animal motive technology.              The advances in machines was also related to the coke based blast furnaces       which made cheap iron and other metallurgy processes possible at largr       scales.        Iron cannon production drove much of this interest in blast based       Technology.              It was a synergy of these elements coming together at a point in history       and place at the same time that made it possible in n.w. europe and not       rome.              >Maybe you recall the subject line        ? Hello? China?              China was using water wheels to drive bellows based blast furnaces in the       11th century.              The knowledge and use of advanced metallurgy was common in china.              Use of coal was presentt in the middle ages, as was to be natural gas from       drillled wells.              The major difference was that using the elements above steam power was not       developed in china as a power source.              The basic elements were present in china and elsewhere before the 18th       century in the industrial revolution.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca