From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
    SolomonW wrote:   
      
   > If you read the statement with emphasis added of what is proposed "Re:   
   > 2000-year-old ring '*MAY* belong to Pontius Pilate' archaeologists" this   
   > statement is certainly true. It maybe.   
      
   This is crazy.   
      
   The cite claims it was found in the tomb!   
      
   Herod the Great, if he existed, supposedly died   
   around 4 BC(E), but Pilate wasn't supposed to   
   be there until like 30 years later. So how would   
   his ring fly backwards in time three decades?   
      
   It's all bull. It's all VERY inconsistent bull.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   -- --   
      
   http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/77775528170   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)