Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.history.ancient    |    Ancient history (up to AD 700)    |    57,854 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 56,565 of 57,854    |
|    Martin Edwards to Ned Latham    |
|    Re: Origin of modern humans    |
|    01 Nov 19 07:58:44    |
      From: buzzard554@fastmail.co.uk              On 10/31/2019 8:23 AM, Ned Latham wrote:       > Martin Edwards wrote:       >> JTEM wrote:       >>>       >>> It's never been popular in China, it's never not been disputed and it's       >>> never been internally consistent.       >>       >> A tv programme I once saw seemed to suggest, and I am not sure that I       >> have got this right, that the Chinese think that they are descended from       >> Homo erectus.       >       > Seems a good hypothesis. I read years ago that the facial structure of       > Homo Erectus in East Asia was distinctly Asiatic.       >       >> As they can breed with all other surviving humans, this       >> seems a but odd.       >       > Not at all. Human speciation has been massively muddled by the "experts".       >       Are you saying that Homo erectus was not a different species? It's       plausible. There seem to have been a lot of "humans" and "hominids".       Perhaps some were just individuals with unusual phsysiques.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca