From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   reader wrote:   
      
   > The archaeologist in question was the one featured in your link.   
      
   So you're saying that the archaeologist who concludes that they   
   weren't sacrifices concluded that they were. Hmm. Even by your   
   standards that's pretty dumb.   
      
   And not sure how any of this even touches on the fact that you   
   posted a circular argument! Though, maybe that's a bit too   
   complex for your mind.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
   -- --   
      
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/189572953398   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)