> reader wrote:   
   >   
   >> Smile, you evoked archaeoalogy   
   >   
   >Why do you think it exists?   
      
   Oh gosh, and there I went thinking you knew something about it.>   
      
   >> and it as evidence of population movement   
   >> assuming one gets one with the other willy nilly.   
   >   
   >Almost. If there was a population movement you see it in   
   >the archaeology.   
   >   
   >This isn't speculation.   
      
   Sorry bub, many cultural items can travel via trade etc. without obvious   
   population movement.  For example, in the eara of about the 15 th century   
   one would find chinese made porcelain in s. central africa.  Nary a chinese   
   in sight.   
      
   Now returning your attention to the topic, from which you attempt to   
   divert, genetic material can show population movement without the cultural   
   material items.   
      
   You had a "maybe" notion previously, it ain't been supported by the genetic   
   research, no egyptian domination of the population genetics..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)