From: Braungart@verizon.net   
      
   On Friday, January 29, 2021 at 9:22:43 AM UTC-5, Garry Denke wrote:   
   > On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 8:42:37 AM UTC-6, The Old Man wrote:    
   > > On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 4:33:27 AM UTC-5, Garry Denke wrote:    
      
   > > > Geologists and Geophysicists drilling for petroleum in Nacogdoches,   
   Texas spudded into a 50,000 B.C. skeleton dubbed    
   > > > 'Chief Wahoo of the Caddo Nation' embedded in the Queen City Sand   
   (Eocene) Formation outcrop, and forged iron and    
   > > > bronze tools (agricultural and foraging instruments), being over 50,000   
   years old. Humans were in the Americas roughly    
   > > > 52,000 years ago, the researchers, company man, rig tool-pusher and   
   three tour drillers, roughnecks and derrick men said.    
      
   > > I'm taking a chance here pointing this out but you were off by a factor of   
   100.    
   > > The Eocene was 50,000,000 years ago, not 50,000.   
      
   > Earth is 4.543 billion years old. You and I live on earth. So our ages are   
   off by billions.    
   > The skeleton is 52,000 years (dating) so the tools are 52,000 years old.   
      
    What you're saying makes absolutely NO sense, so I'll restate it. The Eocene   
   Period was about 50,000,000 years ago. You state that the relics were   
   discovered in a formation that is about 50,000 years ago. That would make it   
   from the Pleistocene Epoch [2.   
   588MYA - 11.7 TYA]. That is all I was trying to state. Too many people are   
   trying to state that humanity began far earlier than scientific evidence shows.   
   As far as when did the first humans settle North America, I have read of some   
   evidence showing that it COULD (not accepted by science) have been as early as   
   100,000 years ago, based on some stone tools found in a Mexican creek bed.   
      
   Regards,    
   John Braungart   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)