Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.history.ancient    |    Ancient history (up to AD 700)    |    57,854 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,657 of 57,854    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: Backwards Time Travel? Delayed Choic    |
|    04 Nov 25 22:07:42    |
      XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.conspiracy       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 11/4/2025 9:25 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 11/4/25 5:25 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >       >> What I think is that, of the 100+ climate models that the IPCC is       >> using, our World's future average global temperatures will be within       >> one standard deviation of all of those models, excluding the upper &       >> lower 10%.       >       > #1. Absolutely NOTHING WHAT SO EVER to do with the Delayed Choice       > Quantum Entanglement.       >       > #2. The only way to judge the future results of "Climate Models" is       > to look at the past predictions and the real outcomes. They show a       > 100% failure rate.       >       > #3. The underlying defect in your thinking, what excludes any       > possibility of "Science," is that you're comparing the Holocene to       > itself.       >       > Who cares?       >       > If you want to know what the Holocene should look like, why not compare       > it to the previous interglacial, or the one before that?       >       > Oo! I know: It's because they were warmer. Some 130,000 years before       > the industrial revolution, Neanderthals ruling Europe and it was       > warmer, sea level was roughly 16 feet higher from all the melted ice       > and the "Thermal Expansion."       >       > So a reasonable, rational test says Gwobull Warbling is a farce, and       > going by your own climate models -- past predictions -- it's all a       > farce, yet we need to impoverish BILLIONS to save the polar bears?       >       > AND THEN there's the fact this you derailed yourself. You're replying       > to a thread on the Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement experiments       > and observations, not a thread on climate change.       >       > Seems your disconnect from facts is pretty inclusive...       >              Yes, I do admit that I made a mistake, and I am sorry.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca