Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.history.ancient    |    Ancient history (up to AD 700)    |    57,854 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,701 of 57,854    |
|    JTEM to Dawn Flood    |
|    Re: Backwards Time Travel? Delayed Choic    |
|    10 Nov 25 12:29:11    |
      XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.conspiracy       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 11/10/25 7:51 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:              > Okay, yep, I am not an expert               [---a great deal of irrelevant bullshit deleted---]                     > While exotic solutions to GR certainly exist              There is nothing excluding time travel. In fact, you are always       moving in time -- including backwards -- relative to other       points in the universe.              Always.              For you & me, you'd have to be so far separated for this movement       backwards through time to amount to anything that it's impossible,       as far as we know, for either of us to be effected by any time       differences. But this is not the case with the photon.              Because time slows down as you move closer to the speed of light,       until it actually stops at light speed, things that happen       instantaneously for the photon appear to happen at two different       times FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE.              And we're right. It is real. It is two different times, for us,       even if not for the photon.              Because time is relative.              > (Please note that everything that I wrote in the above paragraph was       > purely from my memory;              I sincerely doubt it, meaning I don't believe you. I know that       memory isn't intelligence but why regurgitate irrelevant nonsense       in the first place?                     >>> Tachyons don't exist       >>       >> You're retarded AND stubborn. There is support for their existence.       >> They can not be ruled out.       >       > Yes, they can be ruled out, at least as of today.              Wrong. There is support for their existence. There are observations       which are consistent with Tachyons existing. It's not "Proof" but       we are speaking of a rather exotic concept here, and we couldn't       even detect them directly anyway.              > The standard model that comprises the 17 fundamental particles makes       > testable predictions              subatomic particles pop in & out of existence, quantum tunnel through       things, display "Spooky Action at a Distance"...              Oddly, nothing I've stated even qualifies as "Exotic."              You want "Exotic?" Do the Google on "One Electron Universe."              Or if you want *Me* to get all "Exotic" on you, I could spill my views       on the Multiverse...              Saying "Entangled Photons are Always in the Same Place & Same Time" is       rudimentary. The inescapable consequence of this is that, because we       live under extremely different rules, what happens in the exact same       place & time for the photon is happening at different places and at       different times for us. And we're both right.              It really is simultaneous for the photon, it really is separated by       time & space for us.              It's inescapable.              PLUS, if tachyons do exist -- AND THERE IS SUPPORT FOR THEIR       EXISTENCE -- we can send messages backwards through time.                                                                      --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca