XPost: alt.paranormal, sci.skeptic, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/11/2025 1:47 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 11/11/25 8:34 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> Yep, I admit that I screwed-up on this one:   
   >   
   >     "Yep. I admit that JTEM is right."   
   >   
   >> In any case, such has nothing to do with tachyons,   
   >   
   > Lol!   
   >   
   > You're such a fucking idiot... "Even if I'm wrong I'd   
   > right."   
   >   
   > Photons break your idiotic worship of "No Retrocausality."   
   >   
   > BECAUSE photons don't experience time AND WE DO, the result   
   > HAS TO BE quantum funkiness such as Retrocausality. It has   
   > to happen, BECAUSE photons and how they exist can't fit into   
   > our human model of space & time.   
   >   
   > Get it, speaking rhetorically?   
   >   
   > FOR US there is a "Before" and "After" and we can't escape   
   > this. But for the photon there is no such thing. Thus, the   
   > Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement were the entangled   
   > photon knows what WE ARE GOING TO DO to it's entangled pair.   
   >   
   > Retrocausality.   
   >   
   > Yet the entirety of your objection to tachyons is that they   
   > break the laws of physics which we just broke with the photons   
   > anyway, creating Retrocausality.   
   >   
      
   Why are tachyons not listed in the 17 fundamental particles of the   
   Standard Model??   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)