TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 38.stars@1:275/1000 264abbcc
REPLY: 2:250/1@fidonet 61e4b334
PID: Synchronet 3.15b-Win32  Oct 17 2011 MSC 1200
TID: SBBSecho 2.12-Win32 r1.203 Oct  8 2011 MSC 1200
  Re: Test 2
  By: Vincent Coen to Carol Shenkenberger on Mon Jan 17 2022 12:06 am

 > Hello Carol!
 > 
 > Sunday January 16 2022 14:49, you wrote to mark lewis:
 > 
 >  >   Re: Test 2
 >  >   By: mark lewis to Carol Shenkenberger on Sun Jan 16 2022 01:50 pm
 > 
 >  >>
 >  >>  On 2022 Jan 16 13:02:36, you wrote to Dallas Hinton:
 >  >>
 >  >>  CS> @TZUTC: -0500
 >  >>  CS> @MSGID: 18.stars@1:275/1000 2649a1de
 >  >>  CS> @REPLY: 1:153/7715.0 1e421500
 >  >>  CS> @PID: Synchronet 3.15b-Win32  Oct 17 2011 MSC 1200
 >  >>  CS> @TID: SBBSecho 2.12-Win32 r1.203 Oct  8 2011 MSC 1200
 >  >>  CS>   Re: Test 2
 >  >>  CS>   By: Dallas Hinton to Carol Shenkenberger on Sun Jan 16 2022
 >  >> 08:44 am
 >  >>
 >  >>  >> Hi, Carol -- on Jan 16 2022 at 09:20, you wrote:
 >  >>  >>
 >  >>  >>  CS> Packer issues
 >  >>  >>
 >  >>  >> Received -- and welcome to node 1000!!
 >  >>  >>
 >  >>  >>
 >  >>  >> Cheers... Dallas
 >  >>  >>
 >  >>
 >  >>  CS> Ok!  Working!
 >  >>
 >  >>  CS> My sig line ok?  Thats a no-see-um on the BBS but should catch
 >  >> it on th
 >  >>  CS> other system.
 >  >>
 >  >>  CS>    xxcarol
 >  >>  CS> --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
 >  >>  CS>  * Origin: Shenk's Wandering Star (1:275/1000)
 >  >>  CS> SEEN-BY: 153/7715 229/426 250/1 275/100 1000 640/1321 3634/12
 >  >> 250/1
 >  >>  CS> 640/1321
 >  >>  CS> SEEN-BY: 3634/0 18/0 123/0 1/120
 >  >>  CS> @PATH: 275/1000 153/7715 3634/12
 >  >>
 >  >> looks find from here...
 >  >>
 >  >> )\/(ark
 >  >>
 >  >> "The soul of a small kitten in the body of a mighty dragon. Look on
 >  >> my majes ye mighty, and despair! Or bring me catnip. Your choice.
 >  >> Oooh, a shiny thing
 >  >> ... Who cares if I'm suffering from apathy.
 > 
 >  > Here too.
 > 
 >  > I think I confused Dallas.  I essentially have 2 separate BBS systems
 >  > now. This message will come from node 1:275/100.
 > 
 >  > What I do not have on 1:275/1000 is an 'ack' from AREAMGR from
 >  > 1:3624/12 or
 >  > 3:640/1321 just yet. That could be delay in transit or could be
 >  > failure to separate routing just yet.  No way for me to tell from this
 >  > end.
 > 
 >  > Polling from 1:275/1000 to see what happens. I could hit a busy (no
 >  > issue) but I seem to connect to all but Vince now from 1:275/1000.
 >  > His aborts which tells me he's not hooked 1:275/1000 in just yet.
 > 
 > Noted, 1:275/1000 set as a aka of 100.
 > 
 > Vincent
 > 

Depending on what you mean, the message before this one is hopefully more
clear.  Traffic for 1:275/1000 should not be sent to 1:275/100 or packed in the
same bundle.  Traffic for net275 (netmail only) hopefully can be sent direct to
it but if not, if bundled with traffic for 1:275/1000, will route to Dallas
where he splits it out and back down to node 1:275/100.

Give me a bit and can email a copy of the 2 here.

  xxcarol
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
 * Origin: Shenk's Wandering Star (1:275/1000)
SEEN-BY: 153/7715 229/426 250/1 275/100 1000 640/1321 3634/12
PATH: 275/1000 153/7715 229/426