Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 50  |
|  Vincent Coen to All  |
|  Good morning  |
|  04 Jan 22 17:04:28  |
 REPLY: 3:640/1321 067D9EA9 MSGID: 2:250/1@fidonet 61d47e1f CHRS: UTF-8 2 TZUTC: 0000 TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.0.7.22 (GNU/Linux-x86_64) Hello Terry and all! Tuesday January 04 2022 15:27, you wrote to Dallas Hinton: No problems with this as I have already starting doing so - I hope. > Hi All, DH>> I think, after reading all your messages, we have a wonderful DH>> opportunity to restructure the file and echomail star system. DH>> Anything we do can be blamed on the necessary changeover! Having DH>> said that, I think it's important that we remain a "behind the DH>> scenes" operation for the most part. I'd like to suggest some DH>> next steps: > I agree. DH>> 1) Cross connect all of us 5 stars to everything, so we all get DH>> all echomail and file areas (including new ones) automatically. DH>> Let the software take care of the dupes and if you wish, run in DH>> pass-through mode -- as long as we send everything we receive. > I agree. DH>> 2) Make sure we all know the right keywords for each other's DH>> software. E.g., I'm using AREAFIX and ALLFIX (or FILEFIX) to DH>> trigger my processing. Hopefully this will work but I do not have the names used from every one so can all post here theirs so we can all double check for auto creation processing. In any event I have (as far as I know) Mark and Dallas. Carol I don't think she has added her system in as she is still involved in setting up the basics. @Carol please so when able. @Terri please send me a QUERY listing for file area echo's set for me so I can check. > In my case it's AREAFIX & FILEFIX. DH>> 3) Let's talk about WHY we exist as a star -- what is our purpose DH>> for FidoNet, given that anyone can connect to anyone else? (I DH>> have some opinions, but I'll keep quiet for now! |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]